• atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Watch “Extrapolations” (pirate it so you don’t give CrApple money). It’s a quite sober take on what could happen if we continue with business as usual.

  • radiofreebc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This is the reason the US wants to make Canada the “51’s state”. They want our water, our oil, our minerals, but not our people. It was always going to be this way, but here we are…now.

    • PineRune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      We should go the other direction. Let Canada take over the Northern US; states like Michigan and Wisconsin are basically Canada already (at least parts of them).

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 hours ago

        states like Michigan and Wisconsin are basically Canada

        Cue confused Midwestern progressives feeling simultaneously outraged and flattered 😁

      • fonix232@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Just take over every bordering state, and any state that would be cut off from the rest of the US due to such a move (e.g. Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island).

        And every time Trump threatens Canada once again, just repeat the process - excluding DC of course.

  • Asafum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    5 hours ago

    How do you write an article like that and then just like… keep breathing… as if you’re a human being deserving of living or something?

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The New York Times and other traditional papers have a tendency to write headlines like that in order to attract attention. When you read it, nine times out of ten you realise they’re not actually endorsing it and the article itself presents a much more reasonable take on it.

      Newspapers editors write this stuff with the assumption that you will read it, not just screenshot it and post it online. Maybe that’s not a good assumption in the age of short attention spans, but it’s what they do.