Seriosly, why?

  • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    The give reason must be procedual, but the real reason is that the Epstein files undoubtedly also contain the names of democrats or democratic backers. They were more than happy doing nothing with those files.

    • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      So, no hiring hackers to actually change votes to Biden/Harris votes, but anything short of that? I dunno, if that were their standard they would have released the Epstein stuff. My real guess is that some Democratic politicians are also on the list. Even if it’s only a couple, they might have figured running against a convicted felon gave them such good odds there was no need to throw any of their own under the bus. And apparently none of them said, “Well but what if he hires hackers to change votes to Trump votes?”

      • 4am@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Musk and Eaton had the means to change votes, not sure what your first statement is about.

        • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m convinced that Trump won because his team changed Harris votes to Trump votes, plain and simple. The differences between their totals were statistically anomalous compared to all the downballot candidates, the variations were just below thresholds that would have triggered automatic recounts, and these anomalies were present in the 7 swing states only. Those facts alone should justify formal audits, which I hope will happen. But it all kind of depends on the fate of the one lawsuit filed so far.

          • 4am@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Then we are in agreement on that. It’s just weird how you lead in on your first sentence.