• isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The worst future: AI art continues to improve until it actually is indistinguishable from human art for 99% of the population. But the cost in turn rises. It costs maybe a quarter of what a human artist would need to charge for the same work. Still cheap enough to mostly put human artists out of business, but still by no means cheap or affordable. The AI companies drive the real artists out of their fields, and then raise the prices as high as they can without allowing a new crop of commercial artists to spring up.

  • arrow74@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I can’t tell you how often I’ve been walking around looking for a place to eat and I see all these AI generated slop menus with AI generated food photos. I just walk away from those places. I can almost forgive the AI generated format for the menu, almost. But I can’t forgive the food photos

  • Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    ah but what if AI slop Corporate Memphis??

    actually that mostly looks accurate lmao except the leaf growing out of the window sill, and the space between blue shirt’s armpit area should probably be white

    • isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They have no faces. They have no eyes. Their ears are smooth slabs. They cannot taste, smell, hear, or see. They cannot even breathe the air around them. They cannot speak. And yet, they somehow persist, kept animate and aware by unknown Eldritch forces. They have no mouths, yet they must scream.

      A plant phasing through walls? Strangely blue-shifted light? Whose to say how physics works in their Godless world? I do not know what Hell these beings dwell in, but I pray that I am never reincarnated there.

      • athatet@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It wasn’t ‘intended’ to be anything. It’s just slop. That’s the problem.

      • Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        13 hours ago

        could be yea, I think a human artist would have made that more obvious to look intentional, like have the chair poking out to his side and above his shoulder

  • KingOfTheCouch@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 hours ago

    TIL that corporate blandness had a name.

    I think it had it’s place as inoffensive background filler but obviously was overdone.

    AI slop is usually so out of place everywhere and it’s quickly gone straight to abused.

  • srasmus@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I’ve thought a lot about why “corporate Memphis” sucks so much. I think it’s because it comes across as incredibly ingenuine. It communicates a Utopian world free of race and gender gaps, which is demonstrably not the case in reality. In a way, the AI art is more genuine. “We don’t give a fuck, neither do you, buy our stuff”. I feel it speaks to an overall nihilism with the world. I think it’s a part of the disillusionment with the “liberal elite” that we find on the left (and honestly, probably the right too). Corporate Memphis is Nancy Pelosi. AI art is JD Vance. The fact we’re yearning for the former shows how terrible the latter really is.

    • ivan@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      15 hours ago

      In my opinion, both Memphis and AI art serve one purpose - to discourage people from thinking for themselves, just in different ways.

      Memphis tries to do that by being so inoffensive it becomes background noise of unrealistic features and colors that strip any personality away.

      AI art is in turn like art of any authoritarian regime - it must convey a propaganda message, and it should do it so clearly, that even simplest organism can get the message, so yeah - the “art” part is basically lost in the process. And with AI you have a tool to do just that - machine to create amalgamation of images beholder has already seen, essentially also becoming a background noise.

  • Ironfacebuster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I’ve been commenting “ai slop” on just about every AI ad I get which has led to some of the advertisers looking at my account/stories and commenting on my posts

    But guess what? It’s not stopping me!

  • avg@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I hope people are starting to realize why software engineers don’t handle UX design and why your standard issue middle aged person was not limited by their lack of graphics design skill to create an ad.