• TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          No the don’t, but nectarines can also get lumped in there, and I think nectarines are better than either. The fruits all find their roots in China in prehistory, so depending on where when they made it to a region and the particulars of the linguistic groups of the time. Its like how limes and lemons weren’t always distinguished in all cultures.

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Well no, not necessarily. Languages don’t necessary map 1:1, and conceptions change over time. What one generation calls a peach, and what a previous generation calls a peach, they might differ.

          Just like a peach, you may have to accept a little fuzz.

          • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            there is sufficient context for that kind of head gymnastics. By looking at the picture, we can clearly see it’s peaches.

            • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              I mean somewhat but I feel like you are trying to flatten things to fit how you want to under them. Language and human experience don’t necessarily meet modern experiences.

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Less extreme in terms of shape but not taste, is the Spanish arándano, meaning blueberry OR cranberry.

        It’s OK because Spanish makes up for it by having European and American names for all variety of critter.