GoodBearComics | website

Transcript

4 Panel Comic

Panel 1: Ron Weasley sits in front of a fireplace with a Gameboy Yellow with Pokémon Red in hand.

Ron: Harry, these muggle games are so fun!

Panel 2: Harry Potter sits across the fireplace from Ron and holds his wand and a Gameboy Red with the screen and wand pointing at Ron.

Potter: Ron, look! My Pokémon is evolving from Abra to Kadabra!

Panel 3: Harry is horrified as magic flies from his wand

Panel 4: Harry comes to the depressing realization of what he’s done.

  • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    We need to stop referencing this problematic IP, and its problematic author, and just let the whole damn thing slide into obscurity.

    • TheEntity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      As much as I loathe the author and mundanely feel indifferent towards the franchise, I can’t agree. It makes me think of H.P. Lovecraft who was far more problematic and yet I wouldn’t want his works to be lost. Granted, he was poor during his lifetime, so he didn’t spread his hate as much, but that’s besides the point.

      If anything let’s keep infringing on her IP!

      • missingno@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Lovecraft is dead, meaning he can’t hurt anyone. Rowling actively uses the money she makes off the franchise to hurt people, and even the most indirect forms of advertisement for her IP ultimately help her profit and then use those profits to do harm.

        • beejboytyson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          You can’t use that excuse, it’s like saying hitler is dead so I can enjoy his art. Please so not let your need to be right to obfuscate what’s moral.

          • missingno@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            J.K. Rowling is alive and doing active harm with the money she makes. And if you financially support her, whether directly or indirectly, you are helping her do harm.

          • starik@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 days ago

            If Hitler created any great art, it would be okay to acknowledge that. He famously didn’t, though.

      • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        We can enjoy her work like Lovecraft’s when she’s as dead as Lovecraft.

        If you want to make that day come sooner, then support your local trans community! Together we can give JK Rowling a stroke!

      • blackbelt352@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Lovecraft was possibly the only instance where it legitimately was fear driving his xenophobia and not hatred. The man was completely and irrationally terrified of everything from air conditioners to mathematics that wasnt on a 2d plane to black people and eventually learned later in life that what scared him previously wasn’t actually scary.

        He also wasn’t a billionaire actively throwing his money and notoriety behind hate groups specifically swaying legislation and public opinion to bring harm to people.

      • Perky@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 days ago

        The difference is that Lovecraft is dead and no longer benefits from any sales or attention. JKR is, unfortunately, still alive and actively spreading as much misery as possible. Considering that there’s a massive advertising push for the new show, we don’t need to do their marketing for them by also spreading comics.

        • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Where did you hear this?

          Lovecraft never made very much money, he was always poor and he died poor.

      • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        Was Lovecraft really more problematic? I heard he was racist, but did he become the equivalent of a billionaire from his works, and use those proceeds to fuel more hate?

      • zloubida@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        that’s besides the point

        I don’t think it is. Giving money to Rowling, directly or indirectly, is to hurt our trans siblings. Buying The Call of Cthulhu won’t do that.

      • CobraCommander@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        H.P. Lovecraft never funded campaigns that made the state strip the rights of non-white people.

        He is nowhere near more problematic, JK actively hurts people and is 100% responsible for trans deaths.