Can we assume that an edited post or comment was made by a human? Kinda curious if the edit flag implies ‘human’ now?

    • Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Not true. It create independent train of thought. If you use an agent and look it act, that’s exactly what it does.

      That’s more thinking than my dogs. Less than a human. And not physiological thinking of course, just a bunch of mathematical processing, but it’s very well capable of performing basic thinking.

      It asks questions, provides answers, discusses those answers, drops them, and repeats. Still all mathematical processing indeed with a sparkle of randomness.

      But it’s a train of thoughts.

      Does it give any truth or reality to what it thinks? No.

      • forestbeasts@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Saying that dogs think less than “AI” “agents” is INCREDIBLY insulting to dogs. Like, holy fuck, dude.

        – Frost

        • Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          32 minutes ago

          I have four dogs… I know what I am talking about.

          Dogs think, of course, but usually get to better and faster conclusions than AI…

          That’s why they think less than AI.