• Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Oh interesting!

      But funnily enough these ads didn’t air where I grew up and Apple was never even close to the price of a non-Apple PC

      Oh and: Apple, you’ve sold PCs as well! Just because you picked up a cat and put stripes on it you couldn’t just proclaim “look, a tiger!”. But then again … You could. And you did. And in still furious that people bought it.

      • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        tbh, didn’t PC have a more strict definition back then?* specifically, an IBM PC compatible? so, intel processor + DOS (and later OS/2 or windows), which isn’t what apple sold

        *(genuinely asking, i was not around in the 90s 😅)

        (tho i guess even by that definition, intel macs were PCs lol, but that was way later)

        • livingheart@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          the two definitions (general Personal Computer, or IBM-compatible) always co-existed in different contexts.

          aside - even though Apple ads really drove the Macs Vs PCs thing - before they went Intel, Apple computers used to have IBM PowerPC architecture processors.

        • Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          You know that’s another good point, while I was around then and even had a computer back then I’m from a non English country and just learned “PC == personal computer”. It never occurred to me that Apple might have reacted to a US terms or definition up until this very moment it was always “they just wanna be different and fancy”.

          Perhaps a USA person my age bracket can give insights!