• balsoft@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      I think it technically was not “brute forcing” (since it wasn’t found by searching the entire key space), but specifically someone tried generating CA cert private keys from numbers 0-255, and surprisingly found a few.

        • balsoft@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          10 days ago

          We don’t know whether anyone tried it before April 2025, because that’s when the vulnerable certificates were issued. If someone did try it before then, they would not find any certificates (as expected) and probably wouldn’t even talk to anyone about it.

          • Hal@piefed.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            It feels like the kind if thing that someone, somewhere would have a script running constantly testing for private keys with low values. That it went 18 months without being found is a miracle!

            I think there’s a good chance people will be looking for this now so will get caught a lot quicker next time.

            • balsoft@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              10 days ago

              I think there’s a good chance people will be looking for this now so will get caught a lot quicker next time.

              That’s pretty much guaranteed from now on, yes.

              It feels like the kind if thing that someone, somewhere would have a script running constantly testing for private keys with low values. That it went 18 months without being found is a miracle!

              It’s not the kind of thing you’d expect to need to guard against, or even really think of. It should not happen. It sounds like someone was kind of just fooling around with making private keys and stumbled upon it.

              I guess now someone needs to try seeding some of the most popular PRNGs with 0-255 and seeing whether any keys come up in the first few hundred numbers.

      • SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        11 days ago

        It’s just as arbitrary as any other number. You can pick at random, but starting with a dictionary attack of easy, non-random keys would probably be a better start.

        I remember playing a game of dvd-deal or no deal, where you would pick random number from one to twenty and see if you won money. The people I was playing with were mad because I just started guessing 1, 2, 3, 4…

        I told them statistically it was just as likely to be those numbers as anything else.

    • AmyAye@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 days ago

      “Time to brute force this key, I guess I will go get some lun… What do you mean it’s already done? Who uses 4???”

    • Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 days ago

      0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000100