• Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s cool. What does Gentoo do better than Arch in your opinion? Any category! 🙂

    • cadekat@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I haven’t used Arch in a long time, but from what I remember…

      Arch and Gentoo are both rolling releases, but Gentoo is rolling stable while Arch is bleeding edge.

      If you game, you can’t beat being able to drop kernel patches in a folder and have them applied on every update. Works for all packages, not just the kernel.

      GURU has a bit more oversight than the AUR, but not as many packages.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m thinking Arch is definitely for me, then:

        • I prefer bleeding edge. No delay, things haven’t broken my system in a decade, seems like it’s fine for personal use anyway.
        • I don’t need any kernel patches as a heavy gamer, my system can run whatever you throw at it.
        • The AUR seems to have a far simpler and less convoluted process for contributing than GURU.

        Still, I’m curious: what kernel patches do you feel the need to apply, as a gamer?

        • cadekat@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          You can enable the bleeding edge too, if you like. The repos have multiple versions of packages.

          I need the bigsceen beyond patches for better VR support.

          I’ve never contributed to the AUR, so I can’t really compare. GURU does have a bit of process in exchange for some oversight, but there are completely unmoderated overlays too.

          That’s completely fair! I think pacman is a much nicer to use package manager than emerge, and Arch has a great community :3