• melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    If it is a huge amount that you will only do once, save some money and hire a local kid to muscle through the pile, unless the pics are of an adult nature.

    • NotAnOtter@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Also benefits your community. Kids that do little side gigs like that are significantly less likely to pursue nefarious ways of getting cash.

  • bryndos@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    You could ask at a local copy/print shop, they might offer a photo scanning service. If you just have the occasional batch, or one off job. it might be cheaper just to pay them.

  • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    They exist, not cheap though, about $300.

    I’ll drop a link in a few minutes.

    Search for auto feed photo scanner - Amazon has a few. Lowest price is $219

    • Ember@pie.eyeofthestorm.place
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think they’re asking for an automated way to scan in a bunch of photos, instead of doing it one by one on a scanner. Which I’m not sure if there’s a good solution for that besides paying someone else to do it

      • DrSoap@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        There are self feeding scanners. I used to use them for work in medical offices. They’re also great for taxes to keep track of receipts. You can feed like 50 pages at a time with the one I had and they always scan perfectly. This was years ago but it was pricey.

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah there’s a ton of ADF scanners out there. But when OP said they don’t want to damage them I figured they had something fragile they didn’t want to feed through one.

          • DrSoap@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            OOH. That makes sense. I never even considered that. Maybe one of those wand scanners would work? I think the quality on those is usually pretty bad though?