• plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The whole point was keeping the temperature sensor readable remotely so that you didn’t have to pay someone to stand around all day.

    Yes? That was the problem with your suggesting someone go and change it. If you do that, and don’t have it automate the cooler, you STILL need someone.

    Absolute worst case, add a second temp sensor for the automated chill cycles. Pretty sure temperature sensors aren’t that expensive.

    So THAT one can be hacked anyways? Are you even thinking these solutions out at all? Like a little bit?

    • hanke@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I feel like you’re not understanding what I am trying to convey. Or I am not being clear enough?

      A temperature sensor being hacked is nothing to worry about. Worst case scenario, the hacked sensor will report the wrong temperature and some employee will come running over to the freezer. Upon manual inspection they will realise the temperature is in fact not +50°C despite the exposed sensor reporting that.

      The freezers automated freezing/heating just runs off an other separate temperature sensor that won’t be hacked since it is not exposed to the internet.

      Don’t this make sense to you? 😅

      • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Do you not realize all the stuff would be garbage anyways because the legal log says it got too hot? You have it automated so you can adjust or fix the issue before you just water an entire cooler of product lmfao.

        You seem to not comprehend that you’re solutions accomplish literally nothing but more money and time for employees.