like for example: react, C# WebM, WebP, av1, and many more

some parts that big tech made, are really hard to replace, due to them, being complex or fundamental to a speific system

how would we replace them (i hope there are existing replacements for the examples i talked about)?

    • NoLemurs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This is pretty off-base for what OP is asking about.

      React and C# are open source.

      WebM, WebP, and AV1 are open standards that have mature and well developed open source implementations.

      Literally every item OP asked about is already OSS. OP just doesn’t like that they originated at Meta, Microsoft, and Google.

  • NoLemurs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Not everything made by big tech is bad.

    React is great. It’s open source. The governance is reasonable. Why should we replace it?

    WebP, WebM and AV1 are great open technical formats. We should use them.

    If a standard is truly open, then you should judge it on its technical merits, not some weird purity test about where it came from.

    • Adniem@thelemmy.clubOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      sorry to say it, but that maybe wrong, because its big tech, once there are no actual non corporate competitors, they will ruin it

      we should know that when we do depend on something too much, it gets ruined

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 hours ago

        it’s open source though. just clone the previous version and keep building on that. that’s how we got valkey, postgresql, libreoffice, webkit, jenkins, mariadb, all the bsd’s, plex, xorg, wordpress, inkscape, openssh, apache, etc etc etc

      • CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Enshittification is SOP. Its open now because they want to lure market diversity into their ecosystem. You have a point.

        Judging by the downvotes, it seems we never learn.

        • Adniem@thelemmy.clubOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Open Source, Does Not Guarantee That it wont be enshittifed, and also nobody would have the resources to build a fork without funding

          and even if we do fork it, it is a entire city’s worth of work

          • lime!@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            4 hours ago

            but entire cities of volunteers already work on most of the systems you mentioned

          • neidu4@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Then fork the last unshitified version. You don’t need to build a fork. You just fork it, and worst case scenario is that you have a version that didn’t go to shit.

  • YourBestFriend@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Slowly and with an open source offering. But also by making the alternatives so easy that choosing proprietary is actually harder.