Archived copy is here: https://archive.is/DqZ6m

The article says this:

“Immediately withdraw from NATO’s integrated command and then, in stages, from the organization itself. Reject the tribute demanded by the United States of 5% of GDP devoted to defense spending,” read France Unbowed’s 222-page program.

However, France under Mélenchon would still provide assistance to European Union countries under EU treaties, the document added

Is Melenchon right? Is it better for the EU to be the organisation of mutual defence guarantees for Europe, rather than NATO?

    • Hyperion@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It’s called Campism. They take the side of anyone opposing the US even if those countries are objectively shit. It’d be one thing if they had a “the enemy of my enemy” attitude but they go full apologist instead. Russia has a Far Right nationalist government run by a dictator with a Far Right Ultra Nationalist powerbase but people will pretend they are the spitting image of Leftism in a way that even the USSR was not.

        • Hyperion@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          That’s a bizarre theory, I can’t imagine two ideologies being more dramatically different than anarchy and monarchy

          • Natanael@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            It should be, but then you meet real people and some of them are insane reactionaries with no consistency. Especially if they have an authoritarian lean it’s easy to jump from lefty authoritarian to right after they simply changed who they blame for all the problems