• Grostleton@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    That her? Can’t say I blame him tbh, I’d let her steal company/state secrets from me any day ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

    • StillAlive@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      8 hours ago

      No, that’s not Alice Huang.

      And yes, Jensen cheated on his wife with a woman who has the same last name.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      It’s AI slop, the card on the table is the usual AI gibberish text.

      Edit: it’s a real image from a Korean instagram model’s page, but an AI edit of the image was shared with me yesterday which is why I thought it wasn’t real. Either way, she’s not the honeypot.

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Either way, she’s not the honeypot.

        She’s not the honeypot, she’s a honeypot.

        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Zoom in on the card. I also checked tineye and it says the oldest match is from summer of 2023

            • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              8 hours ago

              The version my friends sent to me yesterday was definitley edited with AI; in the post you provided the card says Hello Merrymonder which is a Korean fashion brand whereas my copy it’s gibberish. Guess I should have dug further for an original.

              Just curious, what process did you use to turn up her Instagram post?

              • wjrii@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                8 hours ago

                Yeah, I’d say the version you got has been upscaled and had the canvas expanded by AI. I see, for instance, that the can’s size labeling has been changed to the American version, the Hangul below the logo looks wrong, and the “Hello” goes slop at exactly the point where the original picture cuts off.

                What a strange choice to burn tokens on.

                • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 hours ago

                  Some interfaces use fixed aspect ratios, so perhaps the diffusion model automatically outpainted the original image from the bottom to make the edit, even if that wasn’t the intent.

                  OP’s image uses the correct aspect ratio though.

          • Avicenna@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            I am surprised it got some of the text right it used to be an all around crap for texts. Before that it used to be shadows and before that the fingers. Fucking hell it is going to be indistinguishable from a real photo if it goes like this.

            • jqubed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              It’s getting a lot more challenging to tell; certainly not immediately obvious like it used to be

          • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            Hmm. It appears that someone “outpainted” from the bottom. It mangled some of the text too (like the Dr. Pepper can).

            But the source is real. That image you posted is basically a bad photoshop, but OP’s meme appears to use the real source.

              • darkdemize@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 hours ago

                You know what? I’d be willing to concede that point after a second look. But a lot of the text is definitely AI.

                • wjrii@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  Take a peek at the rest of this thread. There’s a version of the photo that’s been edited with AI, but mostly it’s just JPEG-rot on an English-speaking influencer’s carefully staged pic from 2017 in an upscale Seoul neighborhood.

        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I have noticed a lot of people on here lately crying wolf suggesting something is AI with no clear justification of why, idk maybe that’s why.

          • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            It’s because the truth is often nuanced.

            In this case, there are diffusion edited version of the real image (and original meme) floating around, but the source is real. And the edits are pretty close, more akin to a bad photoshop job.