Just want to make sure I have that right. He spoke up so now they are making shit up to try and defame him? Do I have this bullshit right?
Just want to make sure I have that right. He spoke up so now they are making shit up to try and defame him? Do I have this bullshit right?
Boy so you just didn’t read that article at all, didja?
deleted by creator
Ah perhaps I was unclear: I am perplexed by your decision to use that article as support for your position, even more so given the recent revelation that you read and (presumably) understood it. It seems rather self-contradictory, given the content of the article is a fairly scathing indictment of the very concept of the “backlash phase”.
deleted by creator
Okay sure, let me clarify again: An article which is extremely supportive of Pedro Pascal is a comedically bad choice to go with when you’re attempting to establish the legitimacy of the claim that “most people” are sick of him (which remember, was the initial position taken which people are arguing against).
deleted by creator
Well if I’m remembering right: you didn’t understand an article, pretended you did, were condescending about it then hastily attempted to save face by trying several times to reframe the issue.
I’m really not the right person to answer this one, I’m in this as deep as you are with just as little an idea as to why.
Classic motte and bailey argument you’re up against here.