• FreedomAdvocate
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    If you don’t have cameras you instantly lose a tonne of potential amazing functionality.

    If you’re in public you have no expectation of privacy, so someone being able to photograph you or record you with glasses is no different to being able to do it with a camera or phone.

    • thatonecoder@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      People should still have an expectation of privacy in public spaces to some extent, otherwise the only way is to move to the foresf. One should not have to be concerned about being recorded, especially children (a pdfile can take photos to pick “targets”, so to speak).

      • d7sdx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The pdfile will do it anyways. What concerns me is all those data will be streamed to Meta. They will relay it to Palantir. The best mass surveillance you can think of.

        • FreedomAdvocate
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          The glasses don’t record and stream all the time btw. They don’t have their own built in wireless connection to meta.

      • FreedomAdvocate
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        People should still have an expectation of privacy in public spaces to some extent

        Why? You’re in a public space. You don’t have privacy when you’re out in public. There are already laws around taking photos of minors etc, but it being able to be done via glasses is no different to it being able to be done with a phone or a camera.