Yet you say it is “already annoying” to know the “summary” of the book.
Now we have two possibilities:
this summary of yours is actually accurately representing the book, then if one is annoying, both must be annoying
this summary does not accurately represent the book, only then the summary can be annoying but not the book
If you think 1 is true, you also judge the book, without having read it. If 2 is true, the element on which you base your emotions is flawed and hence you should reconsider it.
Yet you say it is “already annoying” to know the “summary” of the book.
Now we have two possibilities:
If you think 1 is true, you also judge the book, without having read it. If 2 is true, the element on which you base your emotions is flawed and hence you should reconsider it.
Then what?
It all boils down to whether you think your summary accurately represents the book. Do you?
Brudi ich bin mir ziemlich sicher dass du mit ner KI diskutierst die darauf trainiert wurde nervtötend zu sein.
It would if I had to make a book report in school. Instead I am using the Wikipedia page as the primary source.