• Quittenbrot@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    True. I was just confused by calling it the best move for ‘the Chinese’. Because for ‘the Chinese’, I’d argue it didn’t make a difference.

    • einkorn@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      AFAIK, it depends on which segment of society you look at. People living near urban and industrial centers, mainly along the coast, certainly have seen their standard of living rising drastically over the last decades. People in the rural interior of China not so much. And then there’s of course the whole genocide of the Uyghurs in the west of China …

      • Quittenbrot@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        People living near urban and industrial centers, mainly along the coast, certainly have seen their standard of living rising drastically over the last decades.

        Not trying to drag this out so much, as I think we both agree essentially, but wouldn’t this not also have been the case when they had been working in a local factory run by a ‘Western’ company instead?

        • einkorn@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          In essence yes. But the growth of the country’s economy without local technical knowledge would almost entirely depend on these outside investments. There could be a variety of reasons why foreign companies might close up shop and move elsewhere, leaving just huge empty factories behind.