Indulge me for the coming delusion, but if we ignore who this is, forget all the reasons we know that we can’t trust him, and allow ourselves just a few moments to hope that we could live in such a world.

A world where manual labor is no longer needed, where people can just exist as large mammals are meant to exist. Robots will handle it all and we can just do as we please… and the robots are going to be plentiful because once enough of the process of making a robot becomes automated, the cost of it will go to zero. But to get there it is going to require a ton of money… these robots are going to be way too expensive for people to actually buy them, so investors and governments will help out. The investors will eventually lose everything, but that will put us on the way to having everything we need to be created through completely automated systems.

Of course, there will still be jobs for those who really want them - or more likely, who want them and are good at them - or even more likely, who knows the right people… but if we can get our basic needs taken care of it night not fully end poverty but it would be a step in the right direction.

But, alas… It’s Musk saying it so it’s only to further enrich himself and won’t actually happen.

  • Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Isn’t this the same guy who tweeted that he would end world hunger for something less than $6 billion if the World Food Programme would supply a plan? And then WFP supplied the plan. And then Musk just…didn’t supply the funs to prevent people from starving.

    • theyoyomaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Not quite, someone posted that he could end it and he responded that if the WFP provided a plan showing the specifics of how world hunger could be ended for that amount he would fund it. WFP then provided a plan for how that amount could be used to help reduce world hunger for a short time and Elon said “the claim was end world hunger, not reduce it temporarily” which meant they didn’t meet challenge.

  • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Dude read the Culture series, took all the wrong lessons from it and is speedrunning that horrible vision for a sorcery in his own mind.

  • dirthawker0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    "Instead of physically jailing prisoners, Optimus could “follow you around and stop you from doing crime,” he said

    This is going to last all of 30 seconds as that is the amount of time it’ll take for a criminal to hop a cyclone fence and take off never to be seen again. Or we can have the 10 minute scenario where criminal and friends take sledgehammers to the thing and sell it for scrap.

  • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Can the rich should stop running all the cool stuff, please? Optimus, Anduril, palantir, lambas, mithril… Every childhood memory tainted by evil businessmen

  • Naevermix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I’m not even going to look up what “Optimus” is. I don’t waste time on this clown anymore.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You’ve already seen it most likely, that stupid bipedal robot that isn’t autonomous yet and can barely navigate on a concrete floor.

      It’s simply a way to get a trillion dollars by spending a few million on a project that gets scrapped.

    • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You just know already he’s gonna scam, grift and cheat to get that pay package, not do anything worthwhile.

      And if he can’t get it, he’ll cry and sue to get it anyway.

  • oyzmo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Perhaps he should get Full Self Driving to work first… 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • shadowfax13@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    13 hours ago

    in the oligarchs dialect it translates to “eliminate the poor not useful for slave labour”

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I’d be surprised if the build one working robot in the next ten years

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    You should look up where the word robot came from originally.

    So long as there are humans who value power and control and can propagandize the populace to support them, a world where all people can live comfortably and happily as equals will never exist.

  • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    By “eliminate poverty” he means let robots do all the jobs the poors do and let the poors die.

    • MonkRome@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      If you’re talking world wide you could give everyone on earth that is currently in poverty about $1200. That’s enough to help a great deal in poor countries, but it would be very temporary. If you’re talking just the USA, you’d be giving everyone in poverty $30k. That would certainly keep people out of poverty for a while. But under capitalism where people have to work many would be back in poverty in a year. Cash infusion would only work if it was permanent like a UBI.

      Even if you spent that money to build free housing all over the country, it wouldn’t be enough to end poverty, though that would probably be the best use of the money. Just flood the market with housing availability and living gets way cheaper.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        You could eliminate a bunch of systemic issues with a trillion dollars that would amount to essentially ending many of the effects of poverty for most people in poverty I would think.

        Things like food insecurity, shelter, etc.

        You’re right that just spending a trillion dollars as a one off grant to everyone in poverty wouldn’t do much, though. It’d need to be used strategically.

        • TronBronson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          It’s the covid checks versus the infrastructure bill lmao. Should we give everyone $1200 or like build roads that everyone uses. Clearly one has long term economic impacts and one has short term economic impacts.

          Same with how you acquire the money. Raising annual taxes vs civil forfeiture. All this shit is just a distraction from turning the tax system upside down and not relying on the poor/middle class to fund profits for the .01%

      • TronBronson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I mean yes if we as individuals go out and spend said money immediately on food it’s not going to last long. But if a village put their $1200 together to build critical infrastructure they could make life much better with their share. It’s like a government spending program or something!

  • coldengineering1234@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    This guy couldn’t even get autonomous vehicles to work properly. No reason to believe he has the skills to do any of this beyond the fact that we know his morals are fucked up.

    • 87Six@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      21 hours ago

      He can’t even hire people that can do it let alone do any of it himself.