One thing that is entirely facepalm-worthy is this “explanation” the Nova agency gave:
Francesco Civita, a spokesperson for Nova, confirmed that the news agency had ended its relationship with Nunziati over his Gaza question. Civita said that Nunziati had been let go for asking a question that was “technically incorrect” because Russia had invaded a sovereign country unprovoked, whereas Israel was responding to an attack.
So, Pinho could have just made that case, right? There was nothing pushy or loaded about the question. If anything, if one truly believes that the two cases are so different, then they should actually want to be asked this question, as a chance to educate the public about the difference.
Not sure whether don’t understand that their actions are undermining their words, or they just don’t care. I mean, if you really care about being seen as the good guy, you would’t put out an explanation like this right? ‘We let go of a staff member because he asked one technically incorrect question’ really isn’t something a good guy would say, ever. I think they’re well aware they’re full of shit and only care about being on the good side of the Israeli government.
One thing that is entirely facepalm-worthy is this “explanation” the Nova agency gave:
So, Pinho could have just made that case, right? There was nothing pushy or loaded about the question. If anything, if one truly believes that the two cases are so different, then they should actually want to be asked this question, as a chance to educate the public about the difference.
Not sure whether don’t understand that their actions are undermining their words, or they just don’t care. I mean, if you really care about being seen as the good guy, you would’t put out an explanation like this right? ‘We let go of a staff member because he asked one technically incorrect question’ really isn’t something a good guy would say, ever. I think they’re well aware they’re full of shit and only care about being on the good side of the Israeli government.