• Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I don’t understand why the danish officials they even wasted their time to go to Washington to “talk” about this. There’s nothing to talk about this.

    Have they ever tried to reason with a toddler that’s having a tantrum “I want that toy now”? Waste of time.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      They have nothing to lose in doing so.

      At worst “conversations” delay an American invasion giving more time for Denmark to prepare.

      Any half-competent diplomat will ignore “pride” as a consideration for a chance and stopping a war or giving their own side’s military more time to prepare, with no actual downside (i.e. the exact same outcome as if they didn’t engage in “conversations” if that fails).

      Also no doubt a lot of “out of the spotlight” work is going into convicing the members of that Administration who are actually intelligent types putting on a show for Trump and the public that such a move will indirectly be bad for them personally because of the downsides for the people who own them - big American businesses - of turning Europe into an Enemy rather than merely a trade competitor.

    • arendjr@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Simple: if the toddler has found daddy’s gun because the safe was left open… you better try talking before you scare it.

      • EvilCartyen@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 hours ago

        This is not a toddler, this is a guy bigger than you and with lots of guns and friends. Talking is our only option, especially because it means we can also go against the narrative that Denmark cannot defend Greenland.

        Which is true in isolation, but that’s why we’re in NATO and the joint arctic command and have the 1951 deal with the US that you guys can scale up military presence in Greenland at will. Yet it hadn’t happened in 20 years, only reductions.

        Personally I think we should have gone more into how Biden refused to increase the defense of the arctic region within the agreement, give the trumpists a way to call him names and solve the issue within the agreements we have.

        Still, Lars Løkke has been doing the rounds on Fox News and elsewhere to give our perspective, which could influence public opinion and help change the false narratives being spread in the US. From our perspective we had everything to gain from a meeting and very little to lose.

        • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Even if biden had done all that, musk would have undone it for his orange god

          • EvilCartyen@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 hours ago

            That’s not the point, though. The point is to try and change the narrative to be more, shall we say, fact-based. And maybe talk to someone less mental than Trump.

              • EvilCartyen@feddit.dk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Well, that’s what our people did yesterday. Even if Vance is a piece of shit he’s not deranged like Trump, and Rubio is also someone you can have a productive discussion with as a foreign nation provided, of course, that the racist grandpa in charge of your nation calms down for a second and stops posting lies about Greenland every 30 minutes.