• Ascendor@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I think it would just break down in THIS event: No country would want to stand against US for an icy island that isn’t their own. So one after the other would just let Greenland fall to the US, and that would practically mean the NATO is done - because there would be proof that the treaty doesn’t help in a real case.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Invading Greenland is overwhelmingly unpopular among Americans. Trump invading Greenland might even trigger a US civil war.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Of the things that would trigger a Civil War, I think Greenland is low on the list. Wildly unpopular but not the existential domestic threat that would trigger the people to go hot. ICE and domestic military deployment, particularly if he declares no elections, that has potential, but no foreign event is going to sway the domestic population that much, only domestic events have that strong an effect. That sort of thing can matter at the ballot box, but isn’t enough to make people go to the ammo box.

        Maybe you get some European powers to conduct clandestine operations against key US leadership, maybe someone like Stephen Miller gets assassinated by a foreign power, I don’t know. More likely, they make moves that royally screw the US over economically. But I don’t think a civil war or direct military conflict with a foreign power is in the cards over Greenland.

      • Quittenbrot@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Trump invading Greenland might even trigger a US civil war.

        I wouldn’t hold my breath on that, tbh…