1. Do you think all monopolies should be split into different companies, and then given to the workers who would collectivize them?
  2. With some anime (IE: Seven Deadly Sins, Blue Lock and One Punch Man Season 3) and being animated at very low framerates, I blame the rich snobs who exploit these human animators into doing so. What would the animators do if they have their own way?
  • litchralee@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    In the spirit of c/nostupidquestion’s Rule 1, asking two unrelated questions does not seem like it would accrue high-quality answers to either. And I see you’ve already added another post focusing on the first question.

    Since it doesn’t cost 50 cents to make an additional post, I would suggest giving each question its own post. It would keep the discussion more focused, and actual answers should result.

  • ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago
    1. I haven’t seen your examples, but animating on twos and threes is common and how they animate different elements at different cadences and the techniques they use is what imparts the sensations of clarity, smoothness, speed, and impact. A well animated 24fps can easily be superior to 60+ slop that neglects the fundamentals. There are times where more can be beneficial, and there were some anime’s that leveraged ~60fps in specific scenes (in the days of interlacing) but it was used quite sparingly, usually during moments when they wanted an uncanny feeling or detail clarity in high motion; but they’d still use much lower cadences for the vast majority, and not just for cost reasons.
  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    What would the animators do if they have their own way?

    Get paid better. I think fewer of them are as interested in the final product than they are getting a paycheck that isn’t a joke.

  • FoolsQuartz@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Do you think all monopolies should be split into different companies, and then given to the workers who would collectivize them?

    Some areas should just be nationalised, so if a water company, train line, airline, network provider, energy provider, car manufacturer becomes big enough then the government should aim to own their monopoly.

    I like worker owned things as well, but there’s no use introducing it unless the situation demands it. If we take amazon as an example, i would have to see it reach that point only after failing to comply to demands like paying taxes and treating workers with respect. We should legislate these things into being better rather than taking over.

    Because the economy should generally aim to be as simple and efficient in organisation as possible.

  • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago
    1. Sure, and all the other companies that aren’t monopolies should also be worker owned collectives.

    2. I don’t fucking know man, I don’t know any animators.

      • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Sorry about that, it was more of an expression than being directed at you specifically if that makes it better.

        And idk, if being in favor of worker owned collectives is all it takes, then yes. If not, well, I’m hesitant to attach labels to myself or vice versa. The more I learn, the more I realize I don’t know. Could be it’s a shit idea actually, but it seems good to me for now.