• Skavau@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    On some instances and comms absolutely

    No, that was someone banned for downvoting - not for being downvoted. Difference.

    Yeah, I know people can get banned for downvoting in some communities and instances.

    • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Ah I had them reversed.

      Point is still this method is essentially shadow banning those being downvoted constantly. There are times it can be trolls but going against the grain in certain instances could get them hidden for simply saying what others don’t want to hear. Especially when political topic.

      Or as it’s lemmy, witch hunts for being a tankie

      • Skavau@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Point is still this method is essentially shadow banning those being downvoted constantly. There are times it can be trolls but going against the grain in certain instances could get them hidden for simply saying what others don’t want to hear. Especially when political topic.

        I agree. Although mostly, 9 times out of 10 its low-effort trolls and spammers that get that. Also it doesn’t really hide anything, it’s just a warning sign.

        • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          it’s just a warning sign

          For now.

          Although mostly, 9 times out of 10 its low-effort trolls and spammers that get that

          Or in a political environment, or a targeted campaign by instances because someone isn’t pure enough.

          It’s even again in the welcome doc

          The ‘Rep’ column is their reputation. As you can see, some people have been downvoted thousands of times. They’re not going to change their ways, are they?

          • Skavau@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            For now.

            I see no reason why it would ever change to do anything more than that.

            Or in a political environment, or a targeted campaign by instances because someone isn’t pure enough.

            If that happened, we would look into it and likely bring it up to the fediverse.

            Also, downvoters like that tend to get instance banned meaning they can’t maintain it.

            • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Because it always starts small then escalates

              downvoters like that tend to get instance banned meaning they can’t maintain it.

              Only if they’re downvoting those the admins of the instance like

              • Skavau@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Because it always starts small then escalates

                Escalates to what.

                Only if they’re downvoting those the admins of the instance like

                I meant banned from other instances as much as I did home-instance banned. But I’d also add that instances that tolerate and endorse the mass indiscriminate downvoting of other people off-instance would possibly find themselves defederated as well.

                • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  To entirely automated banning or hidding accounts.

                  They should but again if it’s downvoting things the admin dislikes already they won’t care.

                  The point is piefed built in a system people can and will game

                  • Skavau@piefed.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 hours ago

                    To entirely automated banning or hidding accounts.

                    I would oppose that, and I doubt Rimu would do that.

                    They should but again if it’s downvoting things the admin dislikes already they won’t care.

                    Then the instance would find itself defederated I suspect.