The safety organisation VeiligheidNL estimates that 5,000 fatbike riders are treated in A&E [ i.e Accident & Emergency] departments each year, on the basis of a recent sample of hospitals. “And we also see that especially these young people aged from 12 to 15 have the most accidents,” said the spokesperson Tom de Beus.
Now Amsterdam’s head of transport, Melanie van der Horst, has said “unorthodox measures” are needed and has announced that she will ban these heavy electric bikes from city parks, starting in the Vondelpark. Like the city of Enschede, which is also drawing up a city centre ban, she is acting on a stream of requests “begging me to ban the fatbikes”.
You just need to build a public transpotation system that can render cars useless for every use (shopping, commute, free time activities and so on) and that is usable from evertwhere to everywhere, even outside big (and small) cities.
Public transit is one aspect, another one is walkable cities where everything you need in your daily life is just a short walk away. Also, sensible laws regarding rights to work from home for applicable jobs etc.
Having everything you need daily at a walkable distance only works in big cities, in small towns it do not work.
Of course that can work as well.
Only up to a point. Small cities have not the critical mass of inhabitants to make certain services logical or even sustainable.
We are talking about daily necessities. So schools, groceries, entertainment at the minimum. What of those things is unattainable for small cities?
For example having all the types of school of higher grade than the elementary and middle school.
But I suppose we should define “walkable distance” before.
I’d say 15 to 20 minutes.
I would argue that higher education (and universities at the least) can be clustered.
As a note tho: I am not saying that we can just plop this solution in place. It does require pretty intense city planning as well as time.
Seems a little too much to me.
And universities are already clustered (mostly), the problem for someone outside the big cities is the high school: there are many “types” of high schools and in small cities there is not enough students to have one of every type, so you need to move to another small town nearby. And even in big cities like Milan, there is not enough request to have every type of high school at a walkable distance from everyone.
In the end you would need a massive public transportation system (which is good to have anyway) but that must basically work on demand: as long as using a car to do few errands is going to take way less time because trains and buses have a timetable that make you wait 1 hour between them public transportation simply is not really usefull.
I don’t really think you can plan a city this way. Sure, you can try to have a city where you make a car mostly useless for some of the day by day activities but you would not be able to make the car really useless in a city.
They already have it. Yet 78% of household have one.