Irish and EU regulators aggressively “censored” social media coverage of Ireland’s 2024 general election and the recent presidential election, a panel of US politicians has claimed in a report.

The report by the staff on the judiciary committee of the Republican-controlled US Congress alleges “harassment” against tech groups to undermine conservative and populist parties.

      • DandomRude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Yes, unfortunately that is true, except that these “legal entities” cannot be held liable for their crimes in the same way as humans. Therefore, the people who control these companies cannot be held liable for their crimes.

        This is a legal trick that illustrates that the law has nothing to do with justice, while ensuring that billionaires are “legally” above the law that applies to everyone who is not a billionaire.

      • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        8 hours ago

        They are the worst kind of people too, they get the rights of an individual and can be evil but since there’s not a single human to blame they get to go on being evil without consequences like jail time or execution just pay a few dollars here and there to “make amends”

        • suicidaleggroll@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Even worse, they’re legally required to be evil, when being evil is in the shareholders’ best interests. This system is completely broken…

  • linule@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    IDK why people simply don’t use European platforms. It takes 2 minutes to create an account. This problem is so stupid. If people use the „tech giants“ less, it fades away on its own, without any need for big regulatory battles. There are politicians writing books about „digital feudalism“ as if everyone didn’t have the choice to open an account on a different platform in 2 minutes. Come on.

    • green_red_black@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Overall because while opening a new account on a non-US Tech giant is that simple they have fewer people so you risk losing content you may enjoy.

      I can speak from experience in the reason I am still on YouTube & Twitch instead of full transition to is simply because content creators I enjoy are only on those respective platforms.

      • linule@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        You don’t have to be on a single site. Keep using old, but copy post and interact with others too. This allows new sites to grow, while not losing benefits. It’s not a marriage.

        • green_red_black@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          But at the same time makes one go “why am I even here.”

          We can offer tips all we want but at the end of the day it’s the Silicon sites already with the communities already built, moving off them on your own would require building new communities and not everyone is interested in that

          • linule@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Literally just copy paste mechanically to the new site(s). When consuming, read and interact with the little content there is and once done go to big site. It’s just a few more taps/clicks.

    • electrotabby@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      If everyone agreed to move, there would be no problem (as long as the Fediverse can accomodate everyone).

      There’s precedent. There was a myriad of social media sites Worldwide at some point. Then in a few years everyone “agreed” to move to Facebook. There are stories of how they aggressively took over markets, but at the end of the day I supposed they had the technically best site. And after over a decade of decay, people are still stuck.

      • linule@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        They just have to open new accounts, not necessarily leave the old ones. Just copy post to multiple sites. This allows new sites to grow, while keeping benefits of old, with minimal extra effort.

          • Zorque@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Depends on the site, and the tools you use. I know, at least tangentially, there were tools for cross-posting between facebook, twitter, and whatever back when I volunteered with a convention. Surely there could be similar tools for non “tech giant” sites.

  • lennee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    9 hours ago

    mofos cant tolerate one social media (tiktok) they dont control and try to give us shit?