Has anyone tried this? It’s discord reverse engineered.

    • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      So you’re offering to manage my ~40 services, and make sure that all the dependencies are met - and none conflict…?

      I mean, I enjoy hosting things myself, but I’m not going to invite issues that have been resolved by simple solutions. I’ve been around the block with dependency hell, fuck all of that. Now if I was getting paid like 6 figures instead of zero, sure boss, whatever the fuck you say boss, job security all day long. But unless you’re offering, I’m sticking with the easy way.

    • Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I mean, that’s true regardless of how it is running. If the service is externally available, it will be probed for vulnerabilities. At least with a container, you can ward off what files it has access to, so an attacker can’t just ransomware your entire NAS with a single vulnerable service.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        42 minutes ago

        And thaaaat’s why it’s head/tailscale or nothing for me. I’m smart enough to know I don’t know enough to be absolutely confident I won’t get SHODAN’d and end up crying over a home network catastrophe, never feeling truly secure ever again.

        Every now and then it’s tempting to get those fun features in containers like Nextcloud, like public links and federation, but it’s not worth the risk IMHO. Not when there’s state-class adversarial bots written by stupidly smart people roaming the landscape. <_<

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Eh, containers are fine if you know what you’re doing. Just run them in a VM if you want more isolation.

      Definitely not for the average user though.