• Pat_Riot@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    When Smells Like Teen Spirit came out there was already far harder shit. Nirvana was never heavy at all.

    • FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I’m sure there was harder rock in existence. My point wasn’t they were objectively the hardest. It was that our perception of music changes over time.

      • Pat_Riot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I remember listening to Nirvana’s Smells Like Teen Spirit when out came out thinking this was the roughest rock could ever go.

        ☝️

        Those were your exact words…

        • village604@adultswim.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Your reading comprehension is the problem here, not what they said.

          The context of the comment was that rock was something people hadn’t experienced before, and that those perceptions changed with more exposure to the genre.

          When they first heard Nirvana, their opinion was that it was hard rock, because it was the hardest rock they had heard by that point.

          It’s a subjective recounting of their opinion when hearing something new, not an objective classification of Nirvana as hard rock.

        • FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Yes, they are. Me thinking something in the early 90s and it being objectively so at the time are not the same thing. I’ve already let 90s me know that you think my opinion was wrong.