- cross-posted to:
- world@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- world@lemmy.world
After years of wrangling, France has set out a new energy law that slashes its wind and solar power targets and drops a mandate for state-run energy provider EDF to shut down nuclear plants.


One nuclear reactor every eight years? Still better than any current reactor project to date. Where is your argument?
I mean, building a nuclear power plant where none operates at the moment (Germany) would also be an entire nation’s worth of nuclear growth. What sort of argument is that supposed to be. Add solar or add nuclear, duh?
As for the storage: companies are even building long term battery storages without subsidies because it’s worth it on an economical scale to buy the overproduction during peak hours. Show me a nuclear project without subsidies.
Sure, but over these lifespans maintenance and eventually disposal is a massive cost factor which is one of the reason the overall cost calculation is so negative and requires massive subsidies.
Too much, because at least here in Germany, nobody wants to store it permanently. So better don’t produce any waste at all. It’s funny that this argument “It’s so little waste” always comes up but completely fails the reality check.