• FreedomAdvocate
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    No I didn’t. In Australia the registered owner of the car is legally responsible and assumed to be driving the car unless they nominate the person who was.

    The evidence was exceptionally weak

    How is a car running from police, getting its wheels blown out, continuing to run for another few kilometres, and then being abandoned “exceptionally weak”? The police had his car. If he can’t name who was driving it, he is responsible. That’s literally the law.

    If you leave your car at home and one of your kids takes it and gets a speeding fine, parking fine, it red light camera fine and none of them will own up and you can’t figure out who it was, guess who takes the rap for it? YOU. Saying you don’t know who it was isn’t a get out of jail free card.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Read the article ffs

      they are required to provide a statutory declaration naming the person they believe was driving, or alternatively giving as much information as possible about the location of the vehicle and who had access.

      Police told Ngakyunkwokka: “If you don’t do the stat dec [statutory declaration] and name a person, you can be charged”. He was not told that he had to complete the statement even if he could not nominate the driver.

      The police lied to him about what he needed to do. He acted on the advice they gave him.

      Your hypothetical is both irrelevant and not correct, based on the information in the article that you refuse to actually read.

      You are not smarter or more knowledgeable in the law than a district court judge.