The building appears to be among many devastated in Trump’s ‘major combat operations’ as long expected attacks arrive

Iran’s parents had just dropped their children off for class on Saturday morning when they found themselves racing back to school gates, as bombs began to fall across the country in a joint US-Israel attack.

At one elementary school, according to Iran’s state-controlled media, they arrived to find devastation. At least 80 children had been killed in the strike on Shajareh Tayyebeh girls’ school in Minab, southern Iran, the IRNA news agency reported, with dozens more unaccounted for.

In one video circulating on social media, purportedly showing the immediate aftermath of the strike, smoke rises from the burnt-out walls, and debris lies spread across the road. Hundreds of onlookers gathered at the site, some in obvious distress. Screams can be heard in the background. The report of the bombing, its death toll and the video’s source could not immediately be independently verified by the Guardian. Persian factchecking service Factnameh was able to cross-reference the video with other photographs of the school site, and concluded that the video was authentic. Reuters said it had also verified the footage as being from the school.

  • smeenz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Americans are so used to school killings that they don’t blink an eye at this.

    • Arancello@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      How can you live with such a callous disregard for childs lives? What has become of your country?

      • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        I wonder how you will feel after you realize you and your allies have been a big part of the American empire, too?

        See history of the US dollar and international trade.

        Your country likely contributes a significant amount to the US economy, and we go to war together, too.

        how do you live with that?

        • Arancello@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Ok, so in essence you are saying the person who sold shoes to a murderer is equally guilty of the crime committed?

          • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            No, I’m in essence saying that the person who murders with the murderer is equally guilty of murder.

            You should look up who arms Australia, by the way. Can you guess who?

              • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 hours ago

                Help us murder people in Iraq and Afghanistan and you’re beefing up your navy to go to war with your biggest trading partner at America’s behest.

                • teslekova@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  We did help you kill people in Afghanistan and Iraq, but at least in Afghanistan we were killing Taliban, who aren’t exactly nice people to have around. And we made the place better for the people while we were there, even though it all went to shit when we left. I have talked to Australians who fought there, read stories from the locals, heard the words of a few of the people who left Afghanistan to escape the Taliban.

                  In other words, we are imperial vassals who try to do the right thing in the situation directly in front of us, while we indirectly serve the overall goals of Western hegemony. I cannot argue that we’re on the right side of history.

                  Most of our politicians clearly want to distance ourselves from the mask-off fascist US government, because it’s obvious even to their neoliberal eyes that this is too far, but we are tied by a million arrangements. The military ties you mention, the economic ties which are thanfully less important, the language, the cultural similarities, and the shared history of alliance. Most unfortunately, the Five Eyes alliance.

                  If we start leaving all that, we will be stomped on by the US, and our people still believe we need a good friend with a big army to protect us from Chinese aggression. Which is bullshit, as you and I both know, but they do believe that.

                  So it’s easier to just uncomfortably remain closely allied with an unreliable partner, and politely refrain from actually helping the US commit atrocities, and hope they sort it out electorally.

        • teslekova@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          We live with it by having gun laws which have prevented the rash of mass shootings you’ve had, and maintaining foreign aid programs to the countries around us, and many further away.

          Yes, we trade with you, and China, and Israel, and everyone we can, because trade historically opens up opportunities for diplomacy and allows leverage for achieving human rights goals. We are part of the greater US empire, yes indeed, we’ve been too close to the US in the past. But when we found that our special forces had killed civilians in Afghanistan, for example, it resulted in national scandal and ongoing reform, inquiry, etc. In the US that’s just the norm.

          We do not participate in US military actions that may result in civilian deaths. We do not refuel your planes when they do that, for example.

          We are sitting over here, trying to be friends, while being ever more horrified with your country and trying to remember the good times.

            • teslekova@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Well, one aspect of the recent mass shooting in Sydney that was remarkable compared to ones in the US or Europe was that the shooters used long guns that could not fire very fast. Australian laws introduced after the Port Arthur massacre focused on preventing rate of fire and ammo capacity, because it literally slows down the rate at which a shooter can kill people, especially in a crowd. We also do not allow handguns, even though we allow quite powerful long arms.

              If the Bondi shooters had simple trigger-pull semi-automatic ARs, they would likely have killed a lot more people.

              We also have much stricter registration laws, without the loopholes you get in the States, so police generally know who has guns, where they are stored, etc, to a much greater extent, and can check up on gun owners if they want, any time. There are far fewer crazy people with guns, because you can get your license and guns taken away for being crazy, or committing violent crimes, etc.

              Now, the advantage we have over the EU and the USA is a harder border to cross, fewer people crossing it, only eight state/territories to worry about, and uniform federal legislation about what guns are allowed. It makes it easier to restrict the supply of easily obtainable illegal weapons.

              Sure, criminal gangs can get them, but mass shootings are bad for business, so the loners and freaks who typically do mass shootings can’t easily get them.

        • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          The pronoun ‘you’ doesn’t mean you specifically; how can you tell it wasn’t about ‘you’ specifically?

          Because they didn’t change the subject to you specifically, of course. The ‘you’ is a pronoun replacing “The United States Military”, “USAF” “US and Israeli combined forces”, etc.; the subject is who the ‘you’ is referring to, not actually you the person.

          The pronoun is used in English to avoid having to specifically refer to the subject by name over and over.

          Now, go forth, and SIN NO MORE

          • smeenz@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            I may not be American, but I am a native speaker of English, and what you said there is a terrible, or at least tenuous, interpretation. If what you said was the intended meaning, the comment would have begun with ‘Americans, how can you live with …’