• plyth@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    They’re not presented as ever being useful for defending against a near-peer adversary

    How is the USA going to contain China? The way they behave suggests to me that they plan on withstanding a nuclear attack.

    launching a full scale attack.

    How many reactors does the EU have to breed plutonium?

    How many uranium sources do exist that the US cannot convince to sanction the EU?

    How many years does it take to create the nukes for a full scale attack?

    Nukes are a nice idea but for the coming years they won’t be there to solve any problem. The EU has to focus on resolving the conflicts with reason.

    • 73ms@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I’ve seen nothing that suggests USA plans to withstand a nuclear attack from China. I wouldn’t expect them be either because they can’t.

      How exactly the capability can be developed when adversaries don’t want you to is certainly something that needs to be thought about. One part of the puzzle is France that has been signaling they are willing to provide a nuclear umbrella for Europe and just announced some partner countries as well as the expansion of their stockpiles.

      I of course don’t disagree that conflicts need to be resolved with reason if possible but developing a nuclear deterrence doesn’t exclude doing that.

      • plyth@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I’ve seen nothing that suggests USA plans to withstand a nuclear attack from China.

        They have given up respecting other countries. Once China has surpassed the USA how will they be able to keep allies?

        The US are going to lose their power unless they fight China. Would they fight China if China could erase them?