Our waterways are becoming more and more polluted due to PFAS, plastics, medicines, drugs, and new chemicals made by companies that just hand over the responsibility of cleaning to plants paid for by public moneys. Detecting the different chemicals and filtering them out if getting harder and harder. Could the simple solution of heating up past a point where even PFAS/forever chemicals decomposes (400C for PFAS, 500C to be more sure about other stuff) be alright?

    • sploosh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Evaporation is a component of distilling, but if you don’t capture the vapor and condense it it’s just evaporation.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Why would you capture it? It’s waste water, evaporation into the atmosphere should be fine.

        • sploosh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Because if you capture it you’re distilling instead of evaporating. I’m just pointing out the difference between the two. If you read further up, you will see that I don’t think it’s a good idea.

        • atro_city@fedia.ioOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          There might be things in the vapor that haven’t decomposed or that have decomposed, are toxic, and become airborne.

          • Tja@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Like what? Heavy metals would precipitate, organic compounds would break down. (I’m not a chemist, just have general science background).