• NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    214
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Relatedly, Hisense also forces updates and disables use of the TV if you do not accept the update (via a full screen non-cancelable prompt).

    I learned this the hard way after Hisense broke my TV via an update that I didn’t want and then refused to fix it even after 6 months of escalations and emails.

    • midas22@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Hisense are also selling their TVs with different specs on different markets which is really annoying. In the United States you get Google TV but in Europe you get the awful Vidaa OS where you can’t install Google Play Store. And the big national TV streaming apps are missing in their own app store where I live.

      I talked to a retail seller and he said that they ultimately had to stop selling them because they got so many complaints and returns. Maybe it’s a licensing issue or something but it’s just such a braindead decision that is damaging the brand.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      129
      ·
      20 hours ago

      They’re not alone, either. I had to downgrade my Visio just to use the features that it shipped with. I’m sure this is illegal, but no one cares unless you’re rich.

      • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        109
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I outright told them it’s illegal, since they are unilaterally altering the terms of any T&C agreements when we started using the TV and materially interfering with our ownership and use of the TV we purchased. They didn’t care. I then sent it to our state attorney general and nothing happened.

    • amorpheus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      My Hisense got worse in some ways after an update, support provided a file to get the previous firmware back and told me to disable updates. ¯\(ツ)

      • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Funny story, they actually did this to me before this all happened, and I was on a “I’m never going to update again” beta firmware that they gave me a link to, when the forced-update happened that broke my wifi. I didn’t disable any ADB-level processes, and I don’t think the system let me disable updates.

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I know they’re different manufacturers, but TCL tried this shit and I just factory reset and never setup the Internet on it. I use an android TV box for the smarts.

      • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Unfortunately the firmware was the issue, not just OS software. So factory-resetting didn’t help us. But yeah, that definitely radicalized me to the “never connect it to the internet” camp for future TVs.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Buying the TV and then not connecting it still rewards the bad behavior.

          We have to boycott these fucks and lobby to get the behavior outlawed.

          • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            12 hours ago

            I mean, that’s great in theory. But the amount of manufacturers of non-smart TVs is tiny, and if you are interested in the best panels and display technology, refresh rates for gaming, etc (even removing affordability), it’s very very hard to just boycott if you want to have a modern TV at all.

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              16 hours ago

              You are paying for features you don’t use (such as Internet access). That’s not a win.

              • applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                15 hours ago

                They’re saying the company may be selling the device for less than the cost to produce it expecting the low price to draw in consumers while their predatory ads rake in much more money, so buying it and never connecting it means they took a loss. I’m skeptical that companies would do that these days. More likely they overcharge for the physical hardware AND have predatory ad software, you know to maximize shareholder value.

                • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  Even if that were true, you’re still paying more than you would be for a “dumb” TV that doesn’t have those features. So everybody loses but the company selling the hardware still sees a sale. They lose a lot more if they pay the cost to produce and then never sell the device.

                  • groet@feddit.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    14 hours ago

                    You are asuming the cost of a network card and a microchip is higher than the profit they expect from the ads. Many smart TVs are cheaper than an equivalent dumb TV

      • triptrapper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I got a TCL last year and it wouldn’t let me use the TV until I set up the internet. After 4 factory resets I figured out how to put it in store demo mode, and plugged in a separate streaming device that connects to the internet. Now I realize I could have connected the TV to the internet and then blocked it at the network level.

        • Peffse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          16 hours ago

          If you are using a network level block, make sure it’s a black hole and not just a DNS filter. I tried a DNS filter with a Roku and found that they bypass it with hardcoded values, even when the DNS server was statically assigned and DHCP assigned.

          • HumbleBragger@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            14 hours ago

            What you mean by black hole and filter? I blocked a bunch of tcl domains on my pihole and made my router drop everything in port 53 coming from every other device that wasn’t pihole. It seems to have worked for now… Is that a good solution?

            • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              edit-2
              13 hours ago

              Pi-hole blocks the name resolution. TV wants to go to Hisense.com, asks your Pi-hole where that site is. Your Pi-hole sees that Hisense is on a block list, so it says back to your TV “sorry, no idea how to get to that site, it must be offline.”

              If the manufacturer wants to get around this, they program a public DNS in, like 8.8.8.8, or they hardcode the static IP for their website into the TV. Now when it wants to go to Hisense, it never has to ask your Pi-Hole where that site is, and it doesn’t get blocked. Heck, it probably won’t even show up on your Pi-hole’s logs.

              If you black hole the site, then any traffic going out there gets dropped, and the hard-coded addresses on the TV don’t matter for shit.

        • FG_3479@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Their Google TV models have a basic mode which lets you use it without internet with no bypassing.

          • reddig33@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            14 hours ago

            As do the Roku TCL models. I currently have mine disconnected and plan to keep it that way.

      • OR3X@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        Unfortunately manufacturers are starting to get wise to this as well. I recently bought a new Vizio smart TV with no intentions of connecting it to the internet and during the initial setup it kept very persistently insisting that it needed to be connected and after setup it constantly bitches at me that it’s not connected.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      18 hours ago

      My mom has a Hisense TV (because my parents invariably buy the very cheapest they can. They’d get a B&W if they could), and it just started something new - on start up, it now shows a static page of color wash, then you choose a channel. It doesn’t start on the same channel you turned off last night. Must be a new update came through. She let it sit on the screensaver all day, because it never occurred to her to try to change the channel.

      Not a big deal, but weird, and NOBODY asked for this.

    • leoj@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Was gonna say, LG does the same thing.

      So far my only TV that hasn’t forced things in an absurd way has been my Sony… Guess what Sony just did? (Sold their Bravia TV line to TCL…)

      • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I’ve never connected my LG TVs to the internet and they work pretty well.

        I hear you can jailbreak them, which is appealing to me.

        • njordomir@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Are people loading AOSP on there or something? I’m tired of the telemetry and ads LG built in, but my blocklists have seemed to block one of my LG TVs from working. I have a disabled adult in my home and I think Kodi might be too complex for them.

          • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            The person I was talking to just said they had jailbroken WebOS (LG runs webOS not android) and could do whatever.

            Mine’s never connected to the internet before, so I don’t really feel any need to jailbreak it. Though apparently you can ssh in and do stuff, and that sounds kinda cool.

        • leoj@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          No shit? I might have to try that, only problem is my spouse will kill me if I break it… (primary TV)…

        • leoj@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Mine definitely does, disables applications and will lock the screen on update demand if you go long enough. At the bottom of the tv says it LG.

      • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Would have loved to. It was just over one year (right after the warranty ended as well), though.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Is that your card issuer’s policy? I’ve done a chargeback past a year.

          • Peekashoe@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            I went through something similar and am trying to recall, I think I did look and it was past the time period. I should have tried. It’s +2 years now for me.

            Edit: Words.