• brisk@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 months ago

    Similar level to “improve housing availability by freezing housing standards”. Hurts the same people it purports to help.

    • fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah but also nah.

      The relaxed standards will cause more emissions and may reduce longevity of a vehicle.

      The question is how much of each will occur, which I think is unknowable?

      • FreedomAdvocate
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        We do know - none. These new emission laws only came in a few months ago, so we’re just going back to what we were 4 months ago.

        • fizzle@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          If the new laws weren’t going to reduce emissions, why were they introduced?

          • FreedomAdvocate
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            More so we know it doesn’t impact longevity of cars. Emissions have only been lowered for a few months, going back for a while won’t hurt if it helps people afford petrol.

                • fizzle@quokk.au
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  No, I agree with you. We are in agreement regarding the least interesting thing anyone ever agreed on.

                  I replied to the upstream comment without realising that we’re just going back to the rules we had 3 months ago.

                  Again, for clarity, there is no disagreement here.