Altman’s remarks in his tweet drew an overwhelmingly negative reaction.

“You’re welcome,” one user responded. “Nice to know that our reward is our jobs being taken away.”

Others called him a “f***ing psychopath” and “scum.”

“Nothing says ‘you’re being replaced’ quite like a heartfelt thank you from the guy doing the replacing,” one user wrote.

  • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    14 minutes ago

    So, we’re just trafficking in misinformation now?

    Sam Altman Thanks Programmers for Their Effort

    True

    , Says Their Time Is Over

    Complete fiction. Clickbait misinformation.

    The tweet:

    I have so much gratitude to people who wrote extremely complex software character-by-character. It already feels difficult to remember how much effort it really took.

    Thank you for getting us to this point.

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    52 minutes ago

    These idiots want to replace technical workers when AI is more attuned to replacing a CEO at this point. We don’t need Sam anymore.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    41 minutes ago

    “You’re welcome,” one user responded. “Nice to know that our reward is our jobs being taken away.”

    People have to understand that this is what’s behind all the giddiness and wild investing in AI - they are out of their minds at the prospect firing 90% of their human workforce, more if they possibly can. Nobody wants those disgusting humans hanging around, lazy, slow, eating, farting, gossipping, complaining, losers, no self-respecting Sociopathic Oligarch wants them around.

    If they’re so enthusiastic to go to work every day, send them to the work camps, where they can be leased out to corporations as Federal 13th Amendment Work Slaves. They’ll be called 13s. In 10 years, if MAGA is still running the show, 13s will be the primary human workforce, for any jobs that can’t be done by AI or robotic. There will be a small contingent of privileged humans who will work supervisory positions, bossing around the 13s.

  • Gsus4@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 minutes ago

    That’s fine, no need for billionaires either and those were mostly useless.

  • TronBronson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Didn’t he swindle an open source project that was managed by a non profit into a company that only benefits himself? I love how all the rich and powerful are just swindlers. It appears they have no bootstraps.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 minutes ago

    Oh thank goodness, i was concerned he couldn’t look any more ridiculous.

  • Wooki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    45 minutes ago

    Wow he really has lost his mind.

    Remember kids. If no one has any income because their jobs were replaced. Who is going to buy the slop?

    • qaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 minutes ago

      It’s just a form of marketing to convince investors the technology will be able to replace jobs, I don’t get why this is being upvoted.

  • Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    This feels a lot like a ragebait article.

    What did Altman actually tweet that caused the backlash? I can’t seem to find it while skimming, only the responses to it.

    -edit- Found it

    It is a lot less rage inducing than the article makes it out to be.

    • TronBronson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I mean I can see how that draws ire. His contribution doesn’t really line up with his benefits. This project started as an open source, with a non profit running it. Now it’s one of the biggest private companies in the world and threatening to replace a lot of jobs. So if you look at the context, he’s already forgetting how much hard work he stole to make himself obscenely rich and powerful!

      • kossa@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        I mean every obscenely rich and powerful person stole a lot of work from other people…otherwiese they wouldn’t be obscenely rich. So, he’s hasn’t forgotten, he isn’t and never was aware of how much he stole.

        • TronBronson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 hour ago

          His tweet said he’s “already forgetting how much hard work was done”…. by humans! Implying that the AI is doing all the hard work now.

    • melfie@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I didn’t see the “says their time is over” part anywhere that he allegedly said. Guy’s still a piece of shit, but not seeing anything out of line he said in this specific instance.

  • BilSabab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    4 hours ago

    the funny thing is that by all accounts replacing programmers with AI leads to hiring programmers back to fix AI mess.

      • BilSabab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        “more will come”. never underestimate hungry star eyed folks. Look at Grammarly - they’ve been throwing people on the streets for the last three years showing zero loyalty to longterm employees and then replacing them with cheaper newbies over and over. And that after hoarding literally any NLP talent to make competition non-existent - so for NLP folks in Ukraine it means they have nowhere to go outside of military sector which is its own can of worms. Meanwhile Grammarly just keeps on pivoting to AI coding then hiring folks to clean the mess to pivot again.

      • Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        3 hours ago

        For double the salary probably, the problem is there’s always a line of people looking for work.

        That’s why unions are important and for people to not be scabs

        • berrodeguarana@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I am pro-union, but I won’t deny that’s utopic for now.

          Unionizing people on your country? Feasible. But what then? Because with this AI race what they actually are doing is “ok, now I have a ‘bot’ that does a lot of your work, so I’m offering you half of your hourly rate. Oh, you don’t accept it? Ok, let’s substitute our whole mainland team for a remote one with people from LATAM/India/China for 1/3 of the hourly rate.”

          This shit ain’t gonna end well in the long run.

          • TronBronson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            It’s already not looking well. We’ve destroyed the United States, middle class and propped up all the middle classes of the countries you listed. I have no problem with the ladder, but I do have a problem with the former.

      • Natal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Same thing for translation. They replaced us with AI and ask us to proofread and correct the mess for 1/4 the price. I stopped my translation career over this.

  • bthest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Remember when programmers were telling truck drivers to “learn to code bro” when they thought self-driving trucks were going to be a thing?