• Maeve@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It’s good information about how bad the app really is. People should not dismiss the information because of the crappy website complaints.

    • mr_anny@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 minutes ago

      It’s really hard not to dismiss when having a seizure for just trying to read it.

      I really wanted to read.

          • pentastarm@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I run no script on both Firefox desktop and mobile. I’d much rather have to approve things to run, than have them run by default.

            • tal@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              If one has it set to default-deny Javascript, a lot of websites don’t work, because many web developers don’t develop websites that work without Javascript today.

              Historically, websites did a better job of falling back.

          • orclev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            4 hours ago

            There’s dozens of us. Works great on mobile with NoScript, although the source code snippets don’t load. Since the article describes what they do anyway it’s still readable without them, and the excellent performance is worth leaving JS blocked.