• Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Where does it say he’s an AI bro? It just said that he needs to show the investors that Apple can do more AI

    • GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Would they have chosen anyone else to lead the push for AI?

      I for one am completely convinced that Tim Cook is “leaving” because he wasn’t pushing AI as hard as the shareholders wanted. They think they’re falling behind, which in a way they are (but that’s a good thing IMO), and now they’re experiencing FOMO, as shareholders do.

      • mabeledo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        There have been rumors of Cook retiring for the past five years, at least, and I’m pretty sure that shareholders are quite happy with Apple market cap at almost $4 trillion.

        It has nothing to do with AI.

      • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Federighi is the one who talked Cook in to moving the company towards AI, and he’s the person who was put in charge of the AI-ification of Siri when the previous fly was let go. Turnus is a hardware guy. The two things he’s most responsible for are Apple Silicon and AirPods.

        Oh, and he was the one who pushed for the Macbook Neo, which has been hugely successful -commercially, in terms of reception, and has even had CEOs of other companies like Dell saying it’s a serious threat to their business

        • GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Cool. And now he’s gonna be in charge of enshitifiying products with AI.

          Tim left at a good time, and clearly he wasn’t a big fan of AI in its current state, hence the replacement.

      • blitzen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I’m not sold on the idea that’s why Cook is leaving, but I’m with you that Apple may be slow playing the push into AI. If they are dragging their feet, I actually appreciate it.

        • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          All they would have to do is make a stance:

          “We Are Pro Privacy and Anti AI”

          And their popularity would skyrocket.

          • blitzen@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            And their stock would plummet. The stock market is irrational, and is heavily invested in AAPL.

            I would love it, but the board/shareholders would oust any CEO who took that path.

            • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              It might take a dip, but if people responded very positively, maybe Apple could benefit from taking some risk on morally good things. Imagine if stockholders saw that. Apple stock would explode.

              • blitzen@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                Have you paid attention to the stock market? It absolutely wouldn’t respond like that.

                I mean, I wish it would react like you suggest, but I’m not optimistic enough to believe that it would.