Honestly this is why miles of rail is a pointless metric.
Number of people moved, how quickly, how far, how affordably, and distributed by population matter more.
I’ve lived in the US and Europe. Growing up in the US, the nearest public transit, a bus, was about 9 miles away. The roads did not have sidewalks for the vast majority of that and the roads were not designed for bikes. Essentially there was no available transit. If I somehow made it to this stop it would be another 1.5 hr bus ride with transfers to the nearest amtrak station. This wasn’t even the most rural part of the US. 8th most populous state in the country and about 20 miles from the 5th most populous city in that state.
I’ve yet to find anything like that anywhere in the country I’m currently in. Even going on hikes purposefully away from everything there’s still closer public transit than growing up.
I’ve been to plenty of places in the US where you wouldn’t find a bus stop for 50 miles.
And this isn’t even getting into how expensive and slow US rail is. That’s only talking about access.
Distance traveled is a huge thing. Also transit depends on where you live. In the city I live in there is a bus close to pretty much everywhere. They have last mile transit, light rail, and heavy rail as well,l. Servicing 1400 sq miles, 89 miles of light rail, 43 miles of heavy rail. That’s only one area here. I didn’t own a car for 9 years. In the 8 years since then the system has only gotten better, for example when I used to ride transit on Sundays there were only buses every hour and then they stopped after 5. That’s no longer the issue. Anyways. Honestly this argument of the US transit vs EU transit really doesn’t matter. They are far different places with far different needs. I can tell you that rail would work for some things, but definitely not every place.
Yes I’ve traveled to cities in the US as well, but that’s not what I’m saying at all.
These are not far different places with far different needs. Both people need transport. Both people need to get food, medicine, go to school, etc. However one group is significantly served while the other must rely on cars. If you lack the capital to access cars then you are destitute and practically locked into poverty. The percentage of the population with reasonable access to public transit ia significantly lower.
I’m not saying my old neighborhood need a rail connection per se, but it should have reliable transit that connects it to the major hub and provides rail access through that connection.
Honestly this is why miles of rail is a pointless metric.
Number of people moved, how quickly, how far, how affordably, and distributed by population matter more.
I’ve lived in the US and Europe. Growing up in the US, the nearest public transit, a bus, was about 9 miles away. The roads did not have sidewalks for the vast majority of that and the roads were not designed for bikes. Essentially there was no available transit. If I somehow made it to this stop it would be another 1.5 hr bus ride with transfers to the nearest amtrak station. This wasn’t even the most rural part of the US. 8th most populous state in the country and about 20 miles from the 5th most populous city in that state.
I’ve yet to find anything like that anywhere in the country I’m currently in. Even going on hikes purposefully away from everything there’s still closer public transit than growing up.
I’ve been to plenty of places in the US where you wouldn’t find a bus stop for 50 miles.
And this isn’t even getting into how expensive and slow US rail is. That’s only talking about access.
Distance traveled is a huge thing. Also transit depends on where you live. In the city I live in there is a bus close to pretty much everywhere. They have last mile transit, light rail, and heavy rail as well,l. Servicing 1400 sq miles, 89 miles of light rail, 43 miles of heavy rail. That’s only one area here. I didn’t own a car for 9 years. In the 8 years since then the system has only gotten better, for example when I used to ride transit on Sundays there were only buses every hour and then they stopped after 5. That’s no longer the issue. Anyways. Honestly this argument of the US transit vs EU transit really doesn’t matter. They are far different places with far different needs. I can tell you that rail would work for some things, but definitely not every place.
Yes I’ve traveled to cities in the US as well, but that’s not what I’m saying at all.
These are not far different places with far different needs. Both people need transport. Both people need to get food, medicine, go to school, etc. However one group is significantly served while the other must rely on cars. If you lack the capital to access cars then you are destitute and practically locked into poverty. The percentage of the population with reasonable access to public transit ia significantly lower.
I’m not saying my old neighborhood need a rail connection per se, but it should have reliable transit that connects it to the major hub and provides rail access through that connection.
The US used to have this