lemmy.net.au
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
LuminousLuddite@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 hours ago

Utah first state to hold websites liable for users who mask their location with VPNs — law goes into effect, designed to prevent bypassing age checks

www.tomshardware.com

external-link
message-square
176
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • technology@lemmy.zip
  • technology@lemmit.online
  • technology@hexbear.net
  • hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
569
external-link

Utah first state to hold websites liable for users who mask their location with VPNs — law goes into effect, designed to prevent bypassing age checks

www.tomshardware.com

LuminousLuddite@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 hours ago
message-square
176
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • technology@lemmy.zip
  • technology@lemmit.online
  • technology@hexbear.net
  • hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
Senate Bill 73 holds websites liable for users who mask their location.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • fizzle@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    36 minutes ago

    I’m so weary of everything getting a little bit worse every day.

    I’m sure we all used to be excited about the future of the internet but now it’s just shit.

  • Iusedtobeanalien@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Ah Utah

    The medieval backward heartland of the USA

  • TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Good thing my firm doesn’t have an office in UT; we’re all on a VPN to work from home.

    • Flatfire@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 minutes ago

      Generally speaking, most VPNs used for business are a split tunnel, and aren’t forwarding all of your traffic, just the traffic relevant to your company resources that would otherwise be inaccessible unless you were on-site. So your internet traffic and regular browsing are still sent as if you had no VPN connection at all.

      • cmhe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 minutes ago

        Routing is something you can control client-side. Well at least you can configure that all traffic should be routed over the VPN. If your company provides an exit to the internet over VPN is another issue, but I suppose most do.

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    This is just another dog and pony show. If the company doesn’t have any offices or assets in utah, then they don’t have to care. Utah can censor it’s own internet if it doesn’t like it.
    This law simply has no legs to stand on.

    • Snowcano@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      47 minutes ago

      Yeah, I was wondering how on earth this would work. If my organization doesn’t operate or host in Utah and they file suit against me why wouldn’t I tell them to pound sand?

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    IT’S FOR THE KIDS, YOU COMMIE!

  • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Get a list of every dumbass politician who voted this through, and access their campaign websites through a VPN from a computer in Utah. Boom.

    Self owned.

    • Bluewing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Politicians will be exempt. That ain’t that stupid.

      • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 hours ago

        They didn’t write this law, the lobbyists did.

  • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    These aren’t “age checks”…it’s identity tracking.

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It’s literally going to be easier for websites to just block all Utah IPs and Geolocations.

    • moseschrute@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’m ok with blocking Utah from the internet. That’s a sacrifice I’m willing to make

  • bagsy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Websites need to block all Utah traffic. If their leaders are going to be shitheads, then no traffic for you until you elect new leaders.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      58 minutes ago

      I say just block Utah. Cut the grid, blow the highways, and burst the pipes. Maybe burn and salt SLC, let’s see well those profligates last against such odds before they act even the vaguely modern rather than riding Smith and Young’s corpse cocks.

    • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Shit just block Utah from porn and they will change their tune quick

    • LuminousLuddite@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Traffic coming from Utah? Believe it or not, jail.

    • washbasin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You should see how they’ve gerrymandered their districts.

  • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Looks like Utah is run by buncha pedos

  • spacegoat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The pedophile class has the audacity to dictate access to a utility under the guise of protecting the children

  • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Age verification is a red line. I will not comply

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Remember when we told people “they’ll make it illegal to use a VPN” and we got snarky replies like “it’s not enforceable LOL”.

    The fuck it isn’t. Traffic coming from a VPN? That’s a paddlin’, kiddo.

    They’re not even trying to masquerade it as… oh, yes, they’re still trying to masquerade as a “think of the children!” measure. Those fuckers.

    • LuminousLuddite@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      https://ur.io/

      People can use this to look like local traffic.

      • DeckPacker@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 hours ago

        This seems a bit sketchy to me. How am I getting paid for participating when it’s completely free?

        • LuminousLuddite@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          https://docs.ur.io/economic-model/economic-model

          Their economic model comes from premium subscriptions. Its free to use with a data cap.

        • LuminousLuddite@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          deleted by creator

          • zorro@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            5 hours ago

            So what legally protects a provider from prison if users view illegal content via my network?

            • apex32@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Reminds me of the guy who got his home raided and electronics seized for running a Tor exit node.

              https://www.zdnet.com/article/austrian-man-raided-for-operating-tor-exit-node/

              Seems risky and a huge legal hassle even if you don’t end up in prison.

            • LuminousLuddite@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              They could run it on a Linux VPS. They might want to have a notice ready as if they were running a tor exit relay and let the host know.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The problem for most users is: they actually want to look like traffic from somewhere else…

        • LuminousLuddite@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I meant to say residential traffic of whatever country they connect to instead of a data center.

      • lusterko0@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        it seems very unsafe

        • LuminousLuddite@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          https://github.com/urnetwork

          Their software is open source.

  • knighthawk0811@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    7 hours ago

    they will use this specifically to prosecute whoever they choose and will only enforce it for that reason

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Problematic now that Firefox has a free VPN with 50gb / mo.

Technology@lemmy.world

technology@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.world

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


  • @L4s@lemmy.world
  • @autotldr@lemmings.world
  • @PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks
  • @wikibot@lemmy.world
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 4.04K users / day
  • 9.57K users / week
  • 15.3K users / month
  • 31K users / 6 months
  • 2 local subscribers
  • 84.3K subscribers
  • 8.78K Posts
  • 291K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • L3s@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • Technopagan@lemmy.world
  • L4sBot@lemmy.world
  • L3s@hackingne.ws
  • BE: 0.19.9
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org