I heard that there would be a new Great Depression.

I’ve also heard a lot of different theories, and one of them interested me: after the bursting of the bubble, AI will not disappear anywhere, is it in vain that so many data centers were built? AI will be embedded everywhere, people won’t even be able to test how it works, “it works somehow, great!” because all human workers will be fired, not at once, of course, but gradually, In a few years, about 2-7 years to be exact(depending on the industry). And because of this, AI systems will begin to get out of control, this will cause incorrect diagnoses, failures in the banking system, arresting or killing innocent people by drones, and so on.

The reason I’ve explained this so poorly is because, in the first place, the topic of AI and the debate around it is terribly infuriating to me, and it’s obvious that the harm from AI won’t be able to compensate for the little benefit it will bring. Secondly, I use a translator, so my text may seem crooked, unnatural, or silly.

  • RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    What’s more interesting is that the AI fueled replacement of human labor is happening along side the largest global rebalancing of trade and finances in history. It could be argued that the U.S. is entering a phase of readjusting to not controlling all of the international trade and being able to run endless debts by doing it. At the end of WW2, the U.S. was able to set the terms for many countries. The contrast between these changes in reduced funding to social welfare programs, which the eventual collapse of the U.S. bond market will force as there will be no money to pay for much besides an outdated military and the interest on the debt. To keep the party going they massively hyped up AI and dumped even more imaginary dollars into it, hoping to be able to replace the need for workers. Creative ways of keeping the bond market bubble going crossed over between these two issues. One example is how tethered currency to the dollar for things like USDT have behind the scenes been funding an increasing share of Treasury debt. It’s all one big interconnected house of cards where at the root of it is an idea based off having exorbitant privilege with a reserve currency. Where you can create this imaginary private company called the Federal Reserve which has magic balance sheets that can act as a second unlimited treasury, while feeding the debt issued by the primary treasury. All of this money just moves around causing inflation and higher interest payments. A system like this will have to collapse at some point and with all the international finanace changes happening, it’s only a matter of time.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The overall problem with humanity is that we think we’re as smart as humans can be, so we are at the pinnacle of human achievement.

    I just saw a video about the first synthesizer. It was built in 1897, and it took up the basement of a building the size of an entire city block. They had the technology to do it, but not to do it well. But they didn’t see it that way. To them, it was the pinnacle of technology. But 75 years later, and we can put that same instrument in a suitcase.

    Data Centers may be something that will be useful in the future, but our tech isn’t good enough yet. Right now it takes an enormous building, and mind-boggling amounts of resources, and does incredible damage to the environment, as well as the damage to the economy and the job market.

    It’s like realizing that you can talk with two tin cans and a string, and then running out and installing a giant international system of tin cans & string, instead of waiting for the tech to advance to a point where we can do it properly.

    Maybe in 50 years, the tech, regulations, and policy will be caught up to the ambition, but right now, we aren’t ready for it at this level of technology.

  • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    AI won’t replace everyone. Have you seen those police robots? At the end of the day, it will be a regular old cop arresting you for making trouble, don’t worry.

    People will loose money, the poor will get poorer, the rich will get richer. Some countries will become more fascist, others might become more sane. People will die, people will commit atrocities, people will fall in love and make more people, and the wheel keeps on turning.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Nobody has said that AI will replace everyone, except rhetorically. But it will replace MANY people, on an increasing basis, as each new iteration gets more powerful.

      It won’t take long before we have a PERMANENT double digit unemployment rate, and the government will gaslight us all into accepting that as normal, even as it rises to the 50% or more.

      • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        OP wrote:

        because all human workers will be fired, not at once, of course, but gradually, In a few years, about 2-7 years to be exact(depending on the industry)

        which I replied to. LLMs won’t replace all human workers, because for instance it cannot do manual labour. And to preemptively answer “but robots”: industrial robots already exist since forever.

        • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Of course industrial robots have always existed, but technology is much better now, and we have AI to power them now. These aren’t your grandpappy’s robots.

          The combination of automation and AI is going to lead to the elimination of entire human powered industries. The technology currently exists to automate EVERY fast food outlet in the country, and every one of those companies already has a system ready to roll out. The only reason they haven’t is because nobody wants to deal with the backlash when it happens. But once it does, the rest are going to follow, quickly. A lot of these jobs are first jobs, second household incomes, retirement supplements, etc. The loss of those jobs will be felt deeply.

          How many people are supplementing their income with driving a ride share? How many older workers are doing that after losing their jobs? Both Uber and Lyft make it very clear on their website that they intend to replace their ENTIRE fleets with autonomous vehicles, which are nothing more than AI powered robots. These are people who aren’t on the unemployment rolls because they have managed to scrape together driving to work. Without this, they go right back to being on the unemployment rolls.

          I just saw a report on autonomous trucks, predicting 170,000 on the roads with a few years. That’s 170,000 lost truck driving jobs. What are those professional drivers going to pivot to?

          AI/ Automation won’t replace every job, but we will eventually have to live with a permanent unemployment rate over 50%, and if they could figure out to replace EVERY job, they would, enthusiastically.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I’ve never er understood why the perfect society would build domes. It’s going to get way to hit in there.

  • vrek@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 day ago

    True answer: no one knows.

    My guess: it seems very similar to the dot Com bubble. Once it pops a lot of companies will lose a lot of money in the valuation and many will likely close their doors. But some will still exist, which are those with good business plans and a reasonable profitable business. Yes the dot Com bubble burst but there is still an internet. Companies basing their business on venture capital based on their valuation will likely crash and burn. A company forcing “Ai” for marketing or such will fail. A company with a good base business which happens to use Ai will probably be fine. For example a company making sandwiches to determine what sandwich you actually want to order probably will fail. A company who happens to use Ai to estimate how much of each type of meat and vegatables to buy each week based on recent use/sales will probably still be fine. Once the bubble burst companies who are only valuable because of marketing as “Ai” will likely die. There are uses but it’s not everything but they are trying to shove it in everything.

    • nymnympseudonym@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      This

      How much Internet was there in 1997 just before the crash?

      How much Internet is there now, 25+ years afterwards?

      • vrek@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        There was a decent amount of internet back then although not as much as there is now. The issue was people giving millions to any company that had a website. Websites were being made for everything and shoved in everyone’s faces. Like I remember there was a block of cartoon on wb11(animaniacs, freakazoid, etc) and they had ads on during the block for the website of the block, which didn’t have a url but a “AOL keyword” you could look up to go to. Nothing to sell, not really any tie-ins just like “do you want to see more from wacko, yacko and dot? Ask your parents to go to AOL keyword whatever the cartoon block was called.”

        • nymnympseudonym@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          people giving millions to any company that had a website

          Yup. There was hype and adding “web” to everything didn’t automatically make it a Better Thing.

          Similarly, the fact that some AI is hype or that some companies are using it stupidly doesn’t change the fact that it is absolutely going to change our society and we won’t want to go back to the time before we had the tech.

          • vrek@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            True just like we can’t go back to the time before the internet. Some companies have a good business which happen to use Ai, they will likely be fine. Some companies only exist because they claim Ai and survive on vc money, they will likely die.

            There are uses of Ai. There are smart uses of Ai. There are incredibly stupid uses of Ai. There are some uses of Ai that are stupid now but will be industry standards in 30 years (think Netflix in late 90s) due to advancements in technology. If you know what companies will be which you could be a billionaire which is what people are betting on. But they are bets, no one really knows what will stick and what will burn…

  • CodenameDarlen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    It’s already happening. A lot of services and free tiers got cut in the last months, and paid tiers got more expensive.

    It’ll not completely vanish, if you’re a sane human being you probably know it has a few usages here and there.

    But once you start using it for real work you’re done, it’s just a matter of time for the chaos.

    I think we’re in the stage of people slowly realizing that AI work isn’t worth the price compared to a real human work. Because it’s expensive for a not so well done job. While real worker do a solid job, with consistency, for the same or less price.

    The irony, given that machines always did jobs faster and more consistenly (like a calculator). But this case here we’re talking about a machine that try to mimic humans work without a well defined behavior.

    LLM models are evolving very little these past months, very few improvements every new release. And so far no solid proof that it can do things well as humans do.

    That Anthropic attempt on making agents build a C compiler was catastrophic, an insane amount of money for a thing filled with flaws. But proved it can’t do anything true valuable and trustworthy.

    • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is a good summary.

      One thing I will add though, I don’t think AI is going away any time soon. The hype and saturation will probably fade a bit (hopefully). But what we are also seeing right now is a move to more self-hosted AIs due to price increases in things like Copilot.

      I wish some if my coworkers would realize the limitations and hazards of over-using AI. Too many of them are still deep-throating all things AI, pushing for it to be used for every single little thing.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    It will be a great time to invest in the stock market.

    People forget the 2008 crash. In March, 2009, before Obama policy was passed, the DOW bottomed out at 6,547.05.

    It’s currently at 49,704.34.

    If you had invested in an index fund back then, you would have earned 7.59x your money.

    • 87Six@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yup

      Issue is, if it affects a lot of things, like 2008, people will likely not have jobs at all or their salaries would go down or stagnate, so people probably won’t be able to invest.

      At least, my parents told me they struggled during that time. I thought common people weren’t much affected but according to them I was wrong.

      All in all I really hope that when it happens I’ll be able to invest.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I kept my head down and worked through it, but yeah, it was scary. Lots of people saw their 401ks wiped out and I was like “First time?”

  • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    What will happen if a global pandemic breaks out? What about a hot war in Europe? Or if they close the Strait of Hormuz?

    What seems to happen is the stock market dips for a few months and then we’re back to breaking all-time highs again. So in other words - discounts on the stock market for a while, and an opportunity for anyone with some expendable cash to make a nice profit. I’ve bought all these dips and I’ll do the same thing again.

  • Lexam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    It can’t burst, it can’t burst! I bet all of my bit coin on this! What are we going to do!? I’ll get a bail out. Yeah that’s it a fucking bail out! Heidi get me my cocaine I have a scheme to plot! Oh it’s right here good. Good.

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    People mention the AI bubble popping because the rest of the American economy is already shit. The housing market is already seeing prices drop from Covid highs. Most major brands are going up-market because the typical consumer market is tapped out. Almost all non-AI tech is on the right side of the S curve, limiting growth.

    The only thing good about the market right now is a bubble that keeps blowing up.