Top Virginia Democrats have decided against exercising a controversial procedural end run around last week’s state Supreme Court ruling that struck down their redistricting, which wiped away a gain of four House seats, the Democratic leader of the state Senate told The New Republic.

The decision—which nixes a complicated idea, discussed over the weekend by Democrats, to replace the state Supreme Court and get the case reheard—is likely to anger rank-and-file Democrats who had hoped the party would respond aggressively to the ruling, which has made it more likely that Republicans hold the House this fall.

The decision also contrasts sharply with moves undertaken by many GOP state legislatures in the South, who are aggressively gerrymandering their states with wild abandon to erase decades-old majority-majority seats from existence, after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a key Voting Rights Act protection against racial gerrymanders.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    to replace the state Supreme Court and get the case reheard

    Y’all think that’s a good idea huh.

    • PorradaVFR@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes.

      Ideal? No. Preferable to allowing the will of voters being quite literally ignored? Yes.

      Far, far worse is happening in states where unilateral supression and redistricting is taking place. Leveraging the ELECTED officials powers to enforce the results that were voted on is honoring their votes.