• Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      No, I think “religious” wars are done for the acquisition of resources and use religion as propaganda to obtain support

      • Nalivai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It’s very convenient if for every example of religiously motivated atrocities you can just say “Nuh-huh, when they say ‘I do an atrocity in the name of my religion because my religion says that I should’ they actually secretly do it for some other unrelated reason”.
        But even in this version of reality you propose, when nobody was ever motivated by religion to do anything bad, when someone says “let’s go kill all the heretics and steal their shit because our god says so”, killing the heretics still comes first, and it wouldn’t be as effective as “let’s go kill our neighbors and steal their shit because I want their shit”. If religion gives an excuse instead of justification, it’s still just as bad.
        But I reiterate that we don’t live in your magical reality, and religion is both motivation and justification for a lot of shit.

        • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          If religion gives an excuse instead of justification, it’s still just as bad.

          Anything can be abused as an excuse, that doesn’t make the thing being falsely accused of being the excuse is to blame. Otherwise atheism is responsible for any suffering caused by an atheist.

          • Nalivai@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            Nobody ever started a war in the name of stamp collecting. Nobody ever raped a kid and used “but I’m a leader of the local board game club therefore I shouldn’t be punished” as an excuse. Nobody assaulted a person because their local woodworking club disagrees whom that person should and shouldn’t love.
            Nobody ever did any of that in the name of atheism either. Because there is no sacred book of atheism that says that we should let 13 years old rape victim die in childbirth because the atheist doctrine doesn’t believe in bodily autonomy.
            If your thing eagerly provides easy and available excuse to do the atrocity your thing is bad and shouldn’t exist. But to reiterate the point that you keep glossing over, your thing provides excuse, justification, motivation, direct orders, all of it, the whole package.

            • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Nobody ever raped a kid and used “but I’m a leader of the local board game club therefore I shouldn’t be punished” as an excuse.

              how about “I am the executive of a film studio”? did they use that as an excuse? “I am rich as fuck”?

              Nobody ever did any of that in the name of atheism either.

              What about the purges against religious people carried out by communist dictatorships? That’s not in the name of atheism? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Christians_in_the_Soviet_Union

              atheist doctrine doesn’t believe in bodily autonomy.

              atheist doctrine doesn’t believe in anything. you can say whatever you want as part of it and it will be due to “religion is wrong, thus doing X has no moral consequence, there is no god”

              your thing provides excuse, justification, motivation, direct orders, all of it, the whole package.

              you can blame anything. Cartoons, video games, etc. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbine_High_School_massacre