• vxx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I just got this Info from a Youtube channel yesterday, so take it with a grain of salt, but they said that the license indeed includes that clause.

    • daannii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Seems like the owner would be suing them if that was the case.

      Honestly it all sounds like manufactured drama to me.

      If you don’t like Bambu product limits. Just use a different brand. There are many other companies. No one is forcing people to use bambu products.

      It would be like me complaining a company doesn’t sell the shoes I want. And then trying to sue them because of that and start drama in shoe comunities. Saying they are in the wrong for not running their company and offering services or products I want.

      • prenatal_confusion@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        44 minutes ago

        Not using it is a way of distancing yourself. I agree. But the bigger issue to me Is that they are making money from the work of others without giving back. It’s an ethical question for me and I want to change that behaviour not just in regards to me as a customer but as a whole for the industry to foster the advancement of the technology itself.

      • vxx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Suing is expensive, but it’s all speculation from my side, so I don’t want to lean heavily into the argument.

        I agree that it got some vibes to it that wants me to agree with you.

        Did they recently implement a “feature” that doesnt allow the printing of guns or something?