I mean, just declare a republic ffs.

  • Knuschberkeks@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    some if them would. Some people are just fascinated by the anachronism of having a king. A palace that once belonged to some king a few hundred years back is just far less interesting than a palace with a living, breathing monarch in it.

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I highly disagree with that. It’s literally the opposite in opinion. I’m way more interested in castles where no one’s living in them now because that way they’re more of an historical Relic. Why do I want to see where some rich fuck head lives today? Let’s see some pricks big screen TV and fancy curtains. Ooh that sounds like fun. Fuck that I go to castles to see murder holes. I go to castles to see dungeons. Not duvets.

      The only time I want to see some rich fuck head living in a castle is when I see them dragged out of it to meet their just ends.

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Well let’s test that. I mean as other people pointed out there’s plenty of places with no monarchy that gets tens of millions of people going to visit their old palaces. But if you want to test it I say let’s kill all the English royalty and see how many people come to visit those castles for a while. If it’s way less then we’ll give a fancy hat to someone new.