Incrementalism marches to the right, it always has. Liberals have claimed for decades they need more time, and everytime they are extended more they shift further to the right. Today’s Democrats are to the far right of 1980s Democrats
It’s okay, just keep not reading what I said and responding to points that I didn’t make. It’s fine, we don’t need to have a good faith discussion if you’re so intent on relying on strawman arguments.
And by the way:
Incrementalism marches to the right, it always has.
That’s demonstrably false. Emancipation was incremental progress. Voting rights were incremental progress. The Civil Rights Movement was incremental progress. None of those things were immediately perfect solutions, but they all made steps towards a more just system, and they all paved the way for further progress. That’s the definition of incrementalism.
Unless you want to argue that each one fixed everything perfectly as soon as it was implemented? If that were the case, then why would the ones that followed have been necessary? Or are you saying that the progress they achieved was actually marching towards the right? Because that would be as ridiculous as claiming that they achieved no progress at all simply because it wasn’t perfect.
Incrementalism marches to the right, it always has. Liberals have claimed for decades they need more time, and everytime they are extended more they shift further to the right. Today’s Democrats are to the far right of 1980s Democrats
It’s okay, just keep not reading what I said and responding to points that I didn’t make. It’s fine, we don’t need to have a good faith discussion if you’re so intent on relying on strawman arguments.
And by the way:
That’s demonstrably false. Emancipation was incremental progress. Voting rights were incremental progress. The Civil Rights Movement was incremental progress. None of those things were immediately perfect solutions, but they all made steps towards a more just system, and they all paved the way for further progress. That’s the definition of incrementalism.
Unless you want to argue that each one fixed everything perfectly as soon as it was implemented? If that were the case, then why would the ones that followed have been necessary? Or are you saying that the progress they achieved was actually marching towards the right? Because that would be as ridiculous as claiming that they achieved no progress at all simply because it wasn’t perfect.