• Noxy@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    19 hours ago

    The 350kw chargers we’ve had for years are good enough. They just need to be reliable and there need to be more of them.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Seriously agree. In reality the changes are marginal. If my charging stop is 15 minutes instead of 20, that’s nice, but it’s a small enough difference to no longer be a decision factor.

      It’s much more important to have more chargers at more locations

  • gex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Are they going to be faster than the new high speed fuel pumps? It used to take a few minutes to pump $20, now it’s almost instant

    • Soulphite@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The cars have battery management systems that help mitigate the damage from fast charging which is caused by heat and improper ionized diffusion. This article is describing that the new fast charging network is too fast for the current cars BMS right now.

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Yes, but for most people the difference doesn’t matter. BMS systems (see other reply) minimize this, and most people typically are doing a much slower charge at home the vast majority of the time. If you really are driving across the US constantly and thus always fast charging for everything it will shorten your battery life. However you will still likely trade in the car before this affects you, and the new owner will note the reduced range but will accept it as a good trade off for the lower cost car.

    • yessikg@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      It can, if you charge the car to 100% everyday. So not a problem for most people

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    So what kind of charge times will this translate to, once implemented? Obviously depends on battery capacity but do we have a ballpark?

    It will be interesting if they can get charge times quicker than gas refueling but obviously that’s a big challenge.

    • UnpledgedCatnapTipper@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      So, my car is a Chevy Bolt EV, and it has a 60kWh battery. If it were capable of charging a 1MW, it would take 3.6 minutes to charge from 0 to 100. My car can unfortunately only charge at a max of about 50kW, but I’ve owned it for 9 months and have only charged on my standard 120v charger (~1.4 kW) at home.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Does it necessarily charge at that rate the whole time though? It slows down as it fills up I believe.

        • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Technically it should be possible to get to 80-90% at full charging power, assuming the car/battery and charger are properly designed (read: cooled) - most are not, so the charging quickly slows down to prevent overheating.

          After that lithium charging (should) transition from Constant Current to Constant Voltage charging, which slowly tapers down to zero, and it usually takes forever to finish.

    • abcd@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      You can estimate the time with a rule of thumb: it’s the battery capacity divided by the charging power.

      So if you have a 100kWh battery:

      • 1 hour if you charge with 100kW
      • 0,5 hours with 200kW
      • 0,33 hours with 300kW
      • 0,25 hours with 400kW

      And so on.

      As I said this is an estimation. There are factors playing a role that result in losses or power limitation. So in reality it would take a bit longer.