Henry Cuellar, Donald Davis, Cleo Fields, Laura Gillen, Vicente Gonzalez, Marcy Kaptur, Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, and Eugene Vindman

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Maybe you should look it up then. Because, if you answer it for them, it’s not really rhetorical, is it?

        • zoloftt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I think you missed the part where I framed it as if I was having a conversation with the person? You’re clearly angry about my choice of literary devices. Sorry to upset you.

          Have a nice day.

          • njm1314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            No, that part was very apparent. You having a make believe conversation where you spoke for the other person is the source of our entire conversation. It’s not a literary device, though, is the problem.

            Also, as long as we’re talking about literary devices immediately trying to frame anyone who disagrees with you as “angry” is a classic. Not a device from any respectable literature though of course.