No it was does not mean that, it can simply mean that if EU makes more difficult for chinese companys to work in EU they will also do the same to EU companies. That’s simply reciprocity
You sound like a Chinese chill. It already is quite difficult for non Chinese to operate in China and they are heavily discriminated against. Getting to parity isn’t necessarily a good thing, but not going there for the risk of causing offense is surrendering your sovereignty.
No it was does not mean that, it can simply mean that if EU makes more difficult for chinese companys to work in EU they will also do the same to EU companies. That’s simply reciprocity
You sound like a Chinese chill. It already is quite difficult for non Chinese to operate in China and they are heavily discriminated against. Getting to parity isn’t necessarily a good thing, but not going there for the risk of causing offense is surrendering your sovereignty.
Except the fact that what you are saying now is completely irrelevant to what was said before
China retaliating doesn’t mean the security concerns are warranted.
Not sure why are you trying to move the goal post
You suggested retaliation through discrimination. They are already doing that. Hence this is not a credible threat.
Last time the EU did this, Ericsson stock fell & they lost billion in Chinese contracts.
So Europe should surrend it’s sovereignty, ok commander clown.ml