• TheIPW@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    You’re right, I missed that.

    I personally use a reverse proxy and Wireguard setup to access remotely.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Not something that unfortunately works as easily for me to connect my ailing mom’s TV to, and do NOT want to manage the reverse proxy + cert + etc setup for a number of reasons

      • SpacePirate@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        If you have a machine at her place that is on most of the time you can have tailscale on that device and then make it ssh into itself with ssh portforwarding on!

        Edit: You can also selfhost headscale and do the same as the comment below said

        • skittle07crusher@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          What in the goddamn fuck, sir

          Step 1) Install tailscale (headscale also exists if you wanna fully self-host it)

          Step 2) Done, solved

          • SpacePirate@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 minutes ago

            That doesn’t slove the problem if your Smart TV doesn’t support tailscale or something like Wireguard. Using another machine connected to a VPN like for example Tailscale/Headscale and then using ssh portforwarding allows you to access the service(jellyfin) on the device without support.

            It would be like this:

            Jellyfin <-- Tailscale/Headscale <— Machine forwarding the jellyfins port <-- Smart TV

            This can be done with a command like this:

            ssh -L 0.0.0.0:8096:jellyfin_tailnet_ip:8096 -f -N user@machine

      • Dultas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yeah it can be more limiting. Personally I got lucky and my mom’s TV runs Android so I could just install a wireguard client.

        I will probably at some point bridge her network with mine since I want to install a TrueNAS box at her house for remote backup. So the VPN client will be moot at that point.

          • Dultas@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Which part? For the TV there was literally a wireguard app. I just had to install it on the TV and configure the connection to my wireguard server.

            For the bridging I gave her my old router which I haven’t tested but I believe should support VPN bridging. I already have her on a subnet that won’t conflict with my network for that reason.

            • med@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              FYI, scrcpy can be an excellent tool for remote support, but you’d better trust the network the interface is on